The Histopathologic Evaluation of Diagnostic Procedures in Nail Melanoma

The Histopathologic Evaluation of Diagnostic Procedures in Nail Melanoma

Authors

  • Emi Dika Dermatology, Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine, University of Bologna
  • Michela Starace Dermatology, Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine, University of Bologna,
  • Aurora Alessandrini Dermatology, Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine, University of Bologna
  • Annalisa Patrizi Dermatology, Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine, University of Bologna
  • Carlotta Baraldi Dermatology, Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine, University of Bologna
  • Cosimo Misciali Dermatology, Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine, University of Bologna
  • Pier Alessandro Fanti Dermatology, Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine, University of Bologna
  • Anna Waśkiel-Burnat Department of Dermatology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warwaw, Poland
  • Lidia Rudnicka Department of Dermatology, Medical University of Warsaw, Warwaw, Poland
  • Bianca Maria Piraccini Dermatology, Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine, University of Bologna

Keywords:

nail melanoma, subungual melanoma, pathology, surgical excision, biopsy

Abstract

Introduction: The diagnostic delay in nail melanoma (NM) has been repeatedly emphasized. It may be related to both clinical misinterpretations and to errors in the bioptic procedure.

Objectives: To assess the efficacy of histopathologic examination in different diagnostic biopsies in NM.

Methods: We retrospectively investigated the diagnostic procedures and histopathologic specimens referred to the Laboratory of Dermatopathology for the clinical suspicion of NM from 2006 to January 2016.

Results: Eighty-six nail histopathologic specimens were analysed consisting in 60 longitudinal, 23 punch and 3 tangential biopsies. A diagnosis of NM was performed in 20 cases, benign melanocytic activation in 51 cases and melanocytic nevi in 15 patients. Longitudinal and tangential biopsy were diagnostic in all cases, regardless of the clinical suspicion. Nail matrix punch biopsy instead was not diagnostic in most of the cases (13/23 specimens).

Conclusions:  In the presence of an NM clinical suspicion, longitudinal biopsy is recommended (lateral or median) because it provides exhaustive information on the characteristics of melanocytes’ morphology and distribution in all the components of the nail unit. Tangential biopsy, recently encouraged by expert authors due to the optimal surgical outcome, in our experience gives incomplete information on tumor extension. Punch matrix biopsy gives limited evidence in the diagnosis of NM.

References

Quinn MJ, Thompson JE, Crotty K, McCarthy WH, Coates AS. Subungual melanoma of the hand. J Hand Surg Am. 1996;21(3):506–511. DOI: 10.1016/S0363-5023(96)80371-6. PMID: 8724488.

Banfield CC, Redburn JC, Dawber RP. The incidence and prognosis of nail apparatus melanoma. A retrospective study of 105 patients in four English regions. Br J Dermatol. 1998;139(2):276–279. DOI:10.1046/j.1365-2133.1998.02365.x. PMID: 9767242.

Blessing K, Kernohan NM, Park KG. Subungual malignant melanoma: Clinicopathological features of 100 cases. Histopathology. 1991;19(5):425–429. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.1991.tb00232.x. PMID: 1757081.

Dika E, Patrizi A, Fanti PA et al. The Prognosis of Nail Apparatus Melanoma: 20 Years of Experience from a Single Institute. Dermatology. 2016;232(2):177-184. DOI: 10.1159/000441293. PMID: 26771575.

Dika E, Piraccini BM, Fanti PA. A gray pigmented band of the third fingernail with distal splitting. JAMA Dermatol. 2014 Feb;150(2):199-200. DOI: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2013.5731. PMID: 24337039.

Boyer A. Fungus hematode de petit doights. Gaz Med Par. 1834;2:212.

Hutchinson J. Melanosis often not black: melanotic whitlow. Br Med J. 1886;1:491.

Piraccini BM, Dika E, Fanti PA. Tips for diagnosis and treatment of nail pigmentation with practical algorithm. Dermatol Clin. 2015 Apr;33(2):185-195. DOI: 10.1016/j.det.2014.12.002. PMID: 25828711.

Braun PR, Baran R, Le Gal AF et al. Diagnosis and management of nail pigmentations. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2007;56(5):835-847. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2006.12.021. PMID: 17320240.

Haneke E, Baran R. Longitudinal melanonychia. Dermatol Surg. 2001;27(6):580-584. PMID: 11442597.

Baran R, Haneke E. Diagnose und Behandlung von longitudinalen Nagel pigmentierungen. Hautarzt. 1984;35:359-365.

Baran R, Kechijian P. Longitudinal melanonychia (melanonychia striata): diagnosis and management. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1989;21(6):1165-1175. DOI: 10.1016/s0190-9622(89)70324-8. PMID: 2685057.

Rich P. Nail biopsy. Indications and methods. J Dermatol Surg Oncol. 1992 Aug;18(8):673-682. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.1992.tb02000.x. PMID: 1307222.

Jellinek N. Nail biopsy. Indications and methods. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2007 May;56(5):803-810. DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.1992.tb02000.x. PMID: 1307222.

Banfield CC, Dawber RP. Nail melanoma: a review of the literature with recommendations to improve patient management. Br J Dermatol. 1999;141(4):628-632. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2133.1999.03099.x. PMID: 10583108.

Glat PM, Shapiro RL, Roses DF, Harris MN, Grossman JA. Management considerations for melanonychia striata and melanoma of the hand. Hand Clin. 1995;11:183-189.

Ruben BS. Pigmented lesions of the nail unit. Semin Cutan Med Surg. 2015 Jun;34(2):101-108. DOI: 10.12788/j.sder.2015.0146. PMID: 26176288.

Jellinek NJ, Vélez NF. Dermatologic Manifestations of the Lower Extremity: Nail Surgery. Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 2016 Jul;33(3):319-336. DOI: 10.1016/j.cpm.2016.02.002. PMID: 27215154.

Vélez NF, Jellinek NJ. Nailing it: promoting nail procedural training in residency and beyond. Dermatol Surg. 2015 Mar;41(3):424-426. DOI: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000000295. PMID: 25705945.

Jellinek NJ, Rubin AI. Lateral longitudinal excision of the nail unit. Dermatol Surg. 2011 Dec;37(12):1781-1785. DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2011.02167.x. PMID: 22093115.

Jellinek N. Nail matrix biopsy of longitudinal melanonychia: diagnostic algorithm including the matrix shave biopsy. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2007 May;56(5):803-810. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2006.12.001. PMID: 17437887

Cogrel O, Haneke E. Tangential excision for a longitudinal melanonychia. Ann Dermatol Venereol. 2015 Jun-Jul;142(6-7):450-451. DOI: 10.1016/j.annder.2015.04.012. PMID: 25979755.

Di Chiacchio N, Loureiro WR, Michalany NS, Kezam Gabriel FV. Tangential Biopsy Thickness versus Lesion Depth in Longitudinal Melanonychia: A Pilot Study. Dermatol Res Pract. 2012;2012:353864. DOI: 10.1155/2012/353864. PMID: 22496683.

Balch CM, Gershenwald JE, Soong SJ et al. Final version of 2009 AJCC melanoma staging and classification. J Clin Oncol. 2009 Dec 20;27(36):6199-6206. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2009.23.4799. PMID: 19917835.

Levit EK, Kagen MH, Scher RK, Grossman M, Altman E. The ABC rule for clinical detection of subungual melanoma. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2000;42(2): 269–274. DOI: 10.1016/S0190-9622(00)90137-3. PMID: 10642684.

Metzger S, Ellwanger U, Stroebel W et al. Extent and consequences of physician delay in the diagnosis of acral melanoma. Melanoma Res. 1998;8(2):181–186. DOI: 10.1097/00008390-199804000-00014. PMID: 9610874.

Kazi R, Moghaddam S, Chu P, Marghoob A. A Histologic Evidence of Melanocytes Isolated to the Nail Matrix. JAMA Dermatol. 2016;152(5):573–575. DOI:10.1001/jamadermatol.2015.5869. PMID: 26865087.

Downloads

Published

2023-04-29

Issue

Section

Original Article

How to Cite

1.
The Histopathologic Evaluation of Diagnostic Procedures in Nail Melanoma. Dermatol Pract Concept [Internet]. 2023 Apr. 29 [cited 2024 Apr. 25];13(2):e2023092. Available from: https://dpcj.org/index.php/dpc/article/view/2686

Share