Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Clinico-Dermoscopic and Histological Correlation: About 72 Cases
Keywords:
clinical form, histopathological grade of differentiation, dermoscopy, Cutaneous squamous cell carcinomaAbstract
Introduction: Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) is the second most common skin cancer. It represents 20% of malignant skin tumors. Dermoscopy is a very useful tool for its diagnosis, which is confirmed by anatomo-pathological study.
Objective: to describe the different dermoscopic structures of cSCC and to investigate their association with clinical form and histopathological grade of differentiation.
Methods: Retro-prospective epidemiological study, collecting patients with squamous cell carcinoma over a period of 5 years. We divided our study population into two groups according to the degree of histological differentiation (well-differentiated and non-well-differentiated) and according to the clinical form (nodulo-ulcerative and nodular) and compared different dermoscopic parameters between these two groups.
Results: Of 72 invasive cSCC, 81.9% were well-differentiated and 18.1% were non-well- differentiated, the clinical form of cSCC was nodulo-ulcerative in 83.3% and nodular in 16.7%. The well-differentiated tumors showed dotted, glomerular and hairpin vessels and the predominance of a white pattern made of centrally distributed keratin as well as white circles, whitish perivascular halo, the distribution of these white structures was radial in nodulo-ulcerarive lesions in contrast to nodular lesions where their distribution as well as that of the keratin was rather diffuse. Non-well-differentiated tumors showed a combined white-red pattern with the predominance of arborizing vessels.
Conclusion:Our results show that dermoscopy can be considered a reliable tool to distinguish between well- and poorly differentiated cSCC, the transition from one to the other is represented by an increase in the amount of mostly arborizing vessels and the decrease in white structures.
References
Bonerandi JJ, Monestier S. Carcinome épidermoïde (spinocellulaire) et ses précurseurs. EMC – Dermatologie. 2011;6:1–18. DOI : 10.1016/S0246-0319(11)56345-9.
Motaparthi K, Kapil JP, Velazquez EF. Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Review of the Eighth Edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging Guidelines, Prognostic Factors, and Histopathologic Variants. Adv Anat Pathol. 2017;24(4):171-194. DOI: 10.1097/PAP.0000000000000157. PMID: 28590951.
Fania L, Didona D, Di Pietro FR, et al. Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma: From Pathophysiology to Novel Therapeutic Approaches. Biomedicines. 2021;9:171. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines9020171. PMID: 33572373. PMCID: PMC7916193.
Parekh V, Seykora JT. Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Clin Lab Med. 2017;37(3):503-525. DOI: 10.1016/j.cll.2017.06.003. PMID: 28802498.
Warszawik-Hendzel O, Olszewska M, Maj M, Rakowska A, Czuwara J, Rudnicka L. Non-invasive diagnostic techniques in the diagnosis of squamous cell carcinoma. J Dermatol Case Rep. 2015;9(4):89-97. DOI: 10.3315/jdcr.2015.1221. PMID: 26848316. PMCID: PMC4733351.
Yélamos O, Braun RP, Liopyris K, et al. Dermoscopy and dermatopathology correlates of cutaneous neoplasms. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2019;80:341-363. DOI:10.1016/j.jaad.2018.07.073. PMID: 30321581.
Saleh HM, Mokhtar MM, Mostafa AE. Dermoscopic criteria of squamous cell carcinoma in relation to clinical variant and histopathologic differentiation grade. J Egypt Womens Dermatol Soc. 2020;17:83-90. DOI: 10.4103/JEWD.JEWD_5_20
Lallas A, Pyne J, Kyrgidis A, et al. The clinical and dermoscopic features of invasive cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma depend on the histopathological grade of differentiation. Br J Dermatol 2015; 172:1308–1315. DOI: 10.1111/bjd.13510. PMID: 25363081.
Zalaudek I, Giacomel J, Schmid K, et al. Dermatoscopy of facial actinic keratosis, intraepidermal carcinoma, and invasive squamous cell carcinoma: a progression model. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2012;66(4):589-597. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2011.02.011. PMID: 21839538.
Marghoob AA, Cowell L, Kopf AW, Scope A. Observation of chrysalis structures with polarized dermoscopy. Arch Dermatol. 2009;145(5):618. DOI: 10.1001/archdermatol.2009.28. PMID: 19451524.
Lin MJ, Pan Y, Jalilian C, Kelly JW. Dermoscopic characteristics of nodular squamous cell carcinoma and keratoacanthoma. Dermatol Pract Concept. 2014;4(2):9-15. DOI: 10.5826/dpc.0402a02. PMID: 24855567. PMCID: PMC4029247.
Zalaudek I, Argenziano G. Dermoscopy of actinic keratosis, intraepidermal carcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma. Curr Probl Dermatol. 2015;46:70-76. DOI: 10.1159/000366539. PMID: 25561209.
Lallas A, Argenziano G, Zendri E, et al. Update on non-melanoma skin cancer and the value of dermoscopy in its diagnosis and treatment monitoring. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2013;13(5):541-558. DOI: 10.1586/era.13.38. PMID: 23617346.
Pyne J, Sapkota D, Wong JC. Squamous cell carcinoma: variation in dermatoscopic vascular features between well and non-well differentiated tumors. Dermatol Pract Concept. 2012;2(4):204a05. DOI: 10.5826/dpc.0204a05. PMID: 23785619. PMCID: PMC3663373.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 sara El-ammari, sara elloudi, hanane baybay, meryem soughi, zakia douhi, fatima zahra mernissi, mohammed omari, samira el fakir, Layla Tahiri
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nc/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Dermatology Practical & Conceptual applies a Creative Commons Attribution License (CCAL) to all works we publish (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/). Authors retain the copyright for their published work.