Evaluation of Foot Deformities in Patients With Ingrown Nails
Keywords:
ingrown toenail, onychocryptosis, hallux valgus angles, pes planus angles, X-rayAbstract
Introduction: Ingrown nail is a condition caused by the perforation of the periungual soft tissues on nail folds by the sides of nail plaque, causing inflammation and severe pain. Recently, the role of foot anatomical disorders in ingrown nail development has been emphasized.
Objectives: The main objective of this study aimed to determine whether foot deformities played significant roles in ingrown nail development with objective radiological parameters.
Methods: The study included 64 patients diagnosed with clinical ingrown nail and 71 patients as controls without any ingrown nail history. In both groups, we evaluated the bilateral foot radiographs of patients with ingrown nails for hallux valgus angle (HVA), interphalangeal angle (IPA), and intermetatarsal angle (IMA) associated with hallux valgus, and the calcaneal pitch angle (CPA), talohorizontal angle (THA), and talometatarsal angle (TMA) related to pes planus.
Results: No significant difference was found in terms of hallux valgus radiological measurements of HVA, IPA and IMA as well as pes planus radiological measurements of CPA and TMA values, when compared to controls. THA was statistically significantly higher in the control group (P = 0.025). There was a moderate strength positive relationship between ingrown nail stage and measured TMA for pes planus diagnosis (rho = 0.326; P = 0.04), yet there are no significant correlations between ingrown nail stage and other angles.
Conclusions: Therefore, we do not recommend foot anatomy correction in the prevention and treatment of ingrown nails, unless there is an accompanying foot deformity; however, pes planus is a foot deformity that can accompany patients with severely ingrown nails.
References
Martínez-Nova A, Sánchez-Rodríguez R, Alonso-Peña D. A new onychocryptosis classification and treatment plan. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2007;97(5):389-393. DOI: 10.7547/0970389. PMID: 17901344.
DeLauro NM, DeLauro TM. Onychocryptosis. Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 2004;21(4):617-630. DOI: 10.1016/j.cpm.2004.05.009. PMID: 15450901.
Haneke E. Controversies in the treatment of ingrown nails. Dermatol Res Pract. 2012;2012:783924. DOI: 10.1155/2012/783924. PMID: 22675345. PMCID: PMC3362847.
Tian J, Li J, Wang F, Chen Z. A new perspective on the nail plate for treatment of ingrown toenail. Dermatol Pract Concept. 2018;8(1):22-27. DOI: 10.5826/dpc.0801a05. PMID: 29445570. PMCID: PMC5808367.
Zuber TJ. Ingrown toenail removal. Am Fam Physician. 2002;15;65(12):2547-2552, 2554. PMID: 12086244.
Thommasen HV, Johnston CS, Thommasen A. The occasional removal of an ingrowing toenail. Can J Rural Med. 2005;10(3):173-180. PMID: 16079034.
Darwish FM, Haddad W, Ammari F, Aoudat Z. Association of abnormal foot angles and onychocryptosis. Foot (Edinb). 2008;18(4):198-201. DOI: 10.1016/j.foot.2008.05.004. PMID: 20307437.
Mozena JD. The Mozena Classification System and treatment algorithm for ingrown hallux nails. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2002;92(3):131-135. DOI: 10.7547/87507315-92-3-131. PMID: 11904324.
Kılıçoğlu O. Ayak başparmağının hastalıkları: Halluks valgus ve halluks rigidus. TOTBİD Dergisi. 2013;12:390–406 .DOI: 10.14292/totbid.dergisi.2013.48.
Deniz G, Kavaklı A, Ögetürk M, Öztürk D, Tatar N,Perilioğlu AZ. Radiographic Evaluation of Flexible Pes Planus in Children on Weight-Bearing and Nonweight-Bearing. F.U. Med.J.Health.Sci. 2014;28(3):129–132.
Arica IE, Bostanci S, Kocyigit P, Arica DA. Clinical and Sociodemographic Characteristics of Patients with Ingrown Nails. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2019;109(3):201-206. DOI: 10.7547/17-023. PMID: 31268783.
Pearson HJ, Bury RN, Wapples J, Watkin DF. Ingrowing toenails: is there a nail abnormality? A prospective study. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1987;69(5):840-842. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.69B5.3680356. PMID: 3680356.
Cho SY, Kim YC, Choi JW. Epidemiology and bone-related comorbidities of ingrown nail: A nationwide population-based study. J Dermatol. 2018;45(12):1418-1424. DOI: 10.1111/1346-8138.14659. PMID: 30264897.
Menz HB, Roddy E, Marshall M, et al. Epidemiology of Shoe Wearing Patterns Over Time in Older Women: Associations With Foot Pain and Hallux Valgus. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2016;71(12):1682-1687. DOI: 10.1093/gerona/glw004. PMID: 26834078. PMCID: PMC5106851.
Córdoba-Fernández A, Montaño-Jiménez P, Coheña-Jiménez M. Relationship between the presence of abnormal hallux interphalangeal angle and risk of ingrown hallux nail: a case control study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2015;16:301. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-015-0749-1. PMID: 26472543. PMCID: PMC4608311.
Dincer Rota D, Bozduman Ö, Tanacan FE, et al. Abnormal foot angles has an association with ingrown toenail. Int J Clin Pract. 2021;75(10):e14474. DOI: 10.1111/ijcp.14474. PMID: 34107146.
Kose O, Celiktas M, Kisin B, Ozyurek S, Yigit S. Is there a relationship between forefoot alignment and ingrown toenail? A case-control study. Foot Ankle Spec. 2011;4(1):14-17. DOI: 10.1177/1938640010382293. PMID: 20921151.
Kalen V, Brecher A. Relationship between adolescent bunions and flatfeet. Foot Ankle. 1988;8(6):331-336. DOI: 10.1177/107110078800800609. PMID: 3402852.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Nihal Sarı, Gülcan Saylam Kurtipek, Mehmet Ünal, Mehmet Öztürk, İlker Fatih Sarı
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Dermatology Practical & Conceptual applies a Creative Commons Attribution License (CCAL) to all works we publish (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/). Authors retain the copyright for their published work.