Melanocytic or Not? Dermoscopy and Reflectance Confocal Microscopy for Lesions Difficult to Diagnose: A Cross-Sectional Diagnostic Accuracy Study

Camila Scharf; Giuseppe Argenziano; Gabriella Brancaccio; Gaetano Licata; Andrea Ronchi; Elvira Moscarella

doi:10.5826/dpc.1104a127

Melanocytic or Not? Dermoscopy and Reflectance Confocal Microscopy for Lesions Difficult to Diagnose: A Cross-Sectional Diagnostic Accuracy Study

Authors

Camila Scharf Dematology Unit, University of Campania L.Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy
Giuseppe Argenziano Dematology Unit, University of Campania L.Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy
Gabriella Brancaccio Dematology Unit, University of Campania L.Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy
Gaetano Licata Dematology Unit, University of Campania L.Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy
Andrea Ronchi Pathology Unit, University of Campania L.Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy
Elvira Moscarella Dematology Unit, University of Campania L.Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy

Keywords:

skin cancer, melanocytic skin cancer, reflectance confocal microscopy, diagnostic dermatology, dermoscopy

Abstract

Background: Different techniques for non-invasive skin examination and early diagnosis of skin lesions are available nowadays, being dermoscopy and reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) the most diffused ones. Several studies supported the complementary use of dermoscopy and RCM that improves diagnostic accuracy when dealing with melanocytic lesions.

Objectives: To analyze RCM diagnostic accuracy in the differential diagnosis between melanocytic and non-melanocytic lesions.

Methods: This is a cohort selected cross-sectional study conducted at the Dermatology Unit of the University of Campania L. Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy, from 2012 to 2020. We searched the image database for all excised lesions for which the clinical and dermatoscopic differential diagnosis was between melanocytic and non-melanocytic and for which an RCM examination was performed. Sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy values were estimated.

Results: The study included 53 cases that were found to have disagreement between clinical, histological and RCM diagnosis, of which, in 31 cases the differential diagnosis was melanocytic vs non-melanocytic lesion. The RCM reached a specificity of 87% (95% CI: 0.73-1) and a sensitivity of 62.5% (95% CI: 0.29-0.96) in the present sample. Diagnostic accuracy was 80.6% (95% CI: 0.67-0.94).

Conclusion: RCM has a high specificity in differentiating between difficult-to-diagnose melanocytic and non-melanocytic lesions.

References

Tschandl P, Rosendahl C, Kittler H. Dermatoscopy of flat pigmented facial lesions. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2015; 29: 120–127. DOI: 10.1111/jdv.12483.

Pellacani G, Longo C, Malvehy J, et al. In vivo confocal microscopic and histopathologic correlations of dermoscopic features in 202 melanocytic lesions. Arch Dermatol. 2008;144:1597-1608. DOI: 10.1001/archderm.144.12.1597.

Scope A, Benvenuto-Andrade C, Agero AL, et al. Correlation of dermoscopic structures of melanocytic lesions to reflectance confocal microscopy. Arch Dermatol. 2007;143: 176-185. DOI. 10.1001/archderm.143.2.176.

Braga JC, Macedo MP, Pinto C, et al. Learning reflectance confocal microscopy of melanocytic skin lesions through histopathologic transversal sections. PLoS One. 2013;8: e81205. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0081205.

Stevenson D, Mickan S, Mallet S, et al. Systematic review of diagnostic accuracy of reflectance confocal microscopy for melanoma diagnosis in patients with clinically equivocal skin lesions. Dermatol Pract Concept. 2013;3(04): 19-27. DOI: doi.org/10.5826/dpc.0304a05.

Langley RGB, Walsh N, Sutherland AE, et al. The diagnostic accuracy of in vivo confocal scanning laser microscopy compared to dermoscopy of benign and malignant melanocytic lesions: a prospective study. Dermatology. 2007;215: 365–72. DOI: 10.1159/000109087.

Borsari S, Pampena R, Benati E, et al. In vivo dermoscopic and confocal microscopy multistep algorithm to detect in situ melanomas. Br J Dermatol. 2018; 179: 163–72. DOI: 10.1111/bjd.16364.

Guitera P, pellacani G, Longo C, et al. In vivo reflectance confocal microscopy enhances secondary evaluation of melanocytic lesions. J Invest Dermatol. 2009;120: 131–8. DOI: 10.1038/jid.2008.193.

Cinotti E, Labeille B, Debarbieux S, et al. Dermoscopy vs. Reflectance confocal microscopy for the diagnosis of lentigo maligna. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2018;32(8): 1284-1921.

Pellacani G, Guitera P, Longo C, et al. The impact of in vivo reflectance confocal microscopy for the diagnostic accuracy of melanoma and equivocal melanocytic lesions. J Invest Dermatol. 2007;127(12):2759–65. DOI: 10.1038/sj.jid.5700993.

Pellacani G, Pepe P, Casari A, et al. Reflectance confocal microscopy as a second-level examination in skin oncology improves diagnostic accuracy and saves unnecessary excisions: a longitudinal prospective study. Br J Dermatol. 2014;171: 1044-1051. DOI: 10.1111/bjd.13148.

Menge TD, Hibler BP, Cordova MA, et al.Concordance of handheld reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) with histopathology in the diagnosis of lentigo maligna (LM): A prospective study. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2016;74: 1114–1120. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2015.12.045.

Guitera P, Menzies SW, Longo C, et al. In vivo confocal microscopy for diagnosis of melanoma and basal cell carcinoma using a two-step method: analysis of 710 consecutive clinically equivocal cases. J Invest Dermatol.2012;132(10): 2386‐2394.DOI: 10.1038/jid.2012.172.

Alarcon I, Carrera C, Palou J, et al.Impact of in vivo reflectance confocal microscopy on the number needed to treat melanoma in doubtful lesions. Br J Dermatol. 2014;170: 802–8. DOI: 10.1111/bjd.12678.

Witkowski AM, Qudzik J, Arginelli F, et al. Improving diagnostic sensitivity of combined dermoscopy and reflectance confocal microscopy imaging through double reader concordance evaluation in telemedicine settings: a retrospective study of 1000 equivocal cases. PLoS One. 2017;12: 0187748. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0187748.