Habits of using social media and the internet in psoriasis patients
Keywords:
psoriasis, social media, internet, habitAbstract
Introduction: Psoriasis significantly affects the patients’ quality of life, which often leads patients to seek online information about this disease.
Objectives: To explore the habits of patients with psoriasis related to their use of SM and the internet to obtain information about their disease.
Methods: 1,520 patients completed the survey and the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) questionnaire. The Psoriasis Area Severity Index scores (PASI) and clinical data of the patients were recorded by their physicians.
Results: Of the 1,114 patients that reported using social media (SM) and the internet, 48.38% regularly and 31.14% sometimes resorted to obtain information about psoriasis. The use of SM and the internet for psoriasis was statistically significantly higher among young people (p=0.000), those with university or higher education (p=0.009), higher DLQI (p=0.000) and PASI (p=0.011) scores, facial (p=0.050), scalp (p=0.032), hand (p=0.048), genital (p=0.001) and inverse (p=0.000) involvement, and arthralgia/arthritis (p=0.006). The participants mostly used the Google (86%) and Facebook (%41). More than half the participants (62.8%) expected dermatologists to inform society that psoriasis is not contagious.
Conclusion: The internet and SM being widely available and offering substantial information to be easily accessed make it very attractive for patients to use these platforms to investigate diseases, including psoriasis. If what is presented on SM conflicts with what the physician says, patients mostly trust the latter, but at the same time, they tend not to share the results of their online inquiries with their physicians.
References
2 Oji V, Luger TA. The skin in psoriasis: assessment and challenges. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2015; 33 (5 Suppl 93): S14–19.
3 Grajales FJ 3rd, Sheps S, Ho K, Novak-Lauscher H, Eysenbach G. SM: a review and tutorial of applications in medicine and health care. J Med Internet Res 2014; 16(2): e13.
4 AlGhamdi KM, Moussa NA. Internet use by the public to search for health-related information. Int J Med Inform 2012; 81(6): 363–373.
5 Gantenbein L, Navarini AA, Maul LV, Brandt O, Mueller SM. Internet and SM use in dermatology patients: search behavior and impact on patient-physician relationship. Dermatol Ther 2020; 33(6): e14098.
6 Alpsoy E, Polat M, FettahlıoGlu-Karaman B, et al. Internalized stigma in psoriasis: A multicenter study. J Dermatol 2017; 44(8): 885–891.
7 Finlay AY, Khan GK. Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI)--a simple practical measure for routine clinical use. Clin Exp Dermatol 1994; 19(3): 210–216.
8 Oztürkcan S, Ermertcan AT, Eser E, Sahin MT. Cross validation of the Turkish version of dermatology life quality index. Int J Dermatol 2006; 45(11): 1300–1307.
9 Eysenbach G, Kohler C. What is the prevalence of health-related searches on the World Wide Web? Qualitative and quantitative analysis of search engine queries on the Internet. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2003; 225–229.
10 Albeshri M, Alharithy R, Altalhab S, Alluhayyan OB, Farhat AM. The influence of modern SM on dermatologist selection by patients. Cureus 2020; 12(12): e11822.
11 Reich J, Guo L, Groshek J, et al. SM use and preferences in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2019; 25(3): 587–591.
12 Kardeş S. Seasonal variation in the internet searches for psoriasis. Arch Dermatol Res 2019; 311(6): 461–467.
13 Yousaf A, Hagen R, Delaney E, Davis S, Zinn Z. The influence of SM on acne treatment: a cross-sectional survey. Pediatr Dermatol. 2020; 37(2): 301–304.
14 Miller MP, Arefanian S, Blatnik JA. The impact of internet-based patient self-education of surgical mesh on patient attitudes and healthcare decisions prior to hernia surgery. Surg Endosc 2020; 34(11): 5132–5141.
15 Bender JL, Hueniken K, Eng L, et al. Internet and SM use in cancer patients: association with distress and perceived benefits and limitations. Support Care Cancer 2021. doi: 10.1007/s00520-021-06077-0. [Last accessed: August 27, 2021].
16 Dumas AA, Lapointe A, Desroches S. Users, uses, and effects of SM in dietetic practice: scoping review of the quantitative and qualitative evidence. J Med Internet Res 2018; 20(2): e55.
17 Perrin A. (2015) Social Networking Usage: 2005-2015. Pew Research Center. Available from: http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/10/08/2015/Social-Networking-Usage-2005-2015/ [Last accessed: August 27, 2021].
18 Fox S. (2005) Health information online. Pew Research Center. Available from: https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2005/05/17/health-information-online/ [Last accessed: August 27, 2021].
19 Greenwood S, Perrin A, Duggan M. (2016) SM Update 2016. Pew Research Center. Available from: https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2016/11/11/social-media-update-2016/ [Last accessed: August 27, 2021].
20 Niu Z, Willoughby J, Zhou R. Associations of health literacy, SM use, and self-efficacy with health information-seeking intentions among SM users in china: cross-sectional survey. J Med Internet Res. 2021; 23(2): e19134.
21 Zhao J, Han H, Zhong B, Xie W, Chen Y, Zhi M. Health information on SM helps mitigate Crohn's disease symptoms and improves patients' clinical course. Comput Human Behav 2021; 115: 106588.
22 Kim WB, Jerome D, Yeung J. Diagnosis and management of psoriasis. Can Fam Physician 2017; 63(4): 278–285.
23 Russo PA, Ilchef R, Cooper AJ. Psychiatric morbidity in psoriasis: a review. Australas J Dermatol 2004; 45(3): 155–159.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Melek Aslan Kayıran, Ayşe Serap Karadağ, İlteriş Oğuz Topal, Esra Adışen, Sevilay Kılıç, Nuray Keskin, Asude Kara Polat, Bengü Çevirgen Cemil, Mualla Polat, Oğuz Yılmaz, Hilal Ayvaz, Filiz Topaloğlu Demir, Sezgi Sarıkaya Solak, Derya Uçmak, Mehmet Salih Gürel, Sema Aytekin, Algün Polat Ekinci, Kübra Nursel Bölük, Neslihan Şendur, Tuğba Özkök Akbulut, Günseli Öztürk, Ayda Acar, Erkan Alpsoy

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Dermatology Practical & Conceptual applies a Creative Commons Attribution License (CCAL) to all works we publish (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/). Authors retain the copyright for their published work.

