Habits of using social media and the internet in psoriasis patients

Habits of using social media and the internet in psoriasis patients

Authors

  • Melek Aslan Kayıran İstanbul Medeniyet University, Göztepe Prof Dr. Süleyman Yalçın City Hospital, Department of Dermatological and Venereal Diseases
  • Ayşe Serap Karadağ Ataşehir Memorial Hospital, Department of Dermatological and Venereal Diseases, Istanbul, Turkey
  • İlteriş Oğuz Topal Health Sciences University, Prof. Dr. Cemil Taşçıoğlu Hospital, Department of Dermatological and Venereal Diseases, Istanbul, Turkey.
  • Esra Adışen Gazi University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Dermatological and Venereal Diseases, Ankara, Turkey
  • Sevilay Kılıç Çanakkale 18 Mart University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Dermatological and Venereal Diseases, Çanakkale, Turkey
  • Nuray Keskin Gazi University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Dermatological and Venereal Diseases, Ankara, Turkey
  • Asude Kara Polat Health Sciences University, İstanbul Training and Research Hospital, Department of Dermatological and Venereal Diseases, Istanbul, Turkey
  • Bengü Çevirgen Cemil Health Sciences University, Dışkapı Yıldırım Beyazıt Training and Research Hospital, Department of Dermatological and Venereal Diseases, Ankara, Turkey
  • Mualla Polat Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Dermatological and Venereal Diseases, Bolu, Turkey
  • Oğuz Yılmaz Akdeniz University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Dermatological and Venereal Diseases, Antalya, Turkey
  • Hilal Ayvaz Süleyman Demirel University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Dermatological and Venereal Diseases, Isparta, turkey
  • Filiz Topaloğlu Demir İstanbul Medipol University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Dermatological and Venereal Diseases, Istanbul, Turkey
  • Sezgi Sarıkaya Solak Trakya University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Dermatological and Venereal Diseases, Edirne, Turkey
  • Derya Uçmak Dicle University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Dermatological and Venereal Diseases, Diyarbakır, Turkey
  • Mehmet Salih Gürel Istanbul Medeniyet University, Göztepe Prof Dr Süleyman Yalçın City Hospital, Department of Dermatological and Venereal Diseases, Istanbul, Turkey
  • Sema Aytekin Health Sciences University, Haydarpaşa Training and Research Hospital Faculty of Medicine, Department of Dermatological and Venereal Diseases, Istanbul, turkey
  • Algün Polat Ekinci İstanbul University, İstanbul Faculty of Medicine, Department of Dermatological and Venereal Diseases, Istanbul Turkey
  • Kübra Nursel Bölük İstanbul University, İstanbul Faculty of Medicine, Department of Dermatological and Venereal Diseases, Istanbul, Turkey
  • Neslihan Şendur Adnan Menderes University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Dermatological and Venereal Diseases, Aydın, Turkey
  • Tuğba Özkök Akbulut Health Sciences University, Haseki Training and Research Hospital, Department of Dermatological and Venereal Diseases, İstanbul, Turkey
  • Günseli Öztürk Ege University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Dermatological and Venereal Diseases İzmir, Turkey
  • Ayda Acar Ege University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Dermatological and Venereal Diseases, İzmir, Turkey
  • Erkan Alpsoy Akdeniz University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Dermatological and Venereal Diseases, Antalya, Turkey

Keywords:

psoriasis, social media, internet, habit

Abstract

Introduction: Psoriasis significantly affects the patients’ quality of life, which often leads patients to seek online information about this disease.

Objectives: To explore the habits of patients with psoriasis related to their use of SM and the internet to obtain information about their disease.

Methods: 1,520 patients completed the survey and the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) questionnaire. The Psoriasis Area Severity Index scores (PASI) and clinical data of the patients were recorded by their physicians.

Results: Of the 1,114 patients that reported using social media (SM) and the internet, 48.38% regularly and 31.14% sometimes resorted to obtain information about psoriasis. The use of SM and the internet for psoriasis was statistically significantly higher among young people (p=0.000), those with university or higher education (p=0.009), higher DLQI (p=0.000) and PASI (p=0.011) scores, facial (p=0.050), scalp (p=0.032), hand (p=0.048), genital (p=0.001) and inverse (p=0.000) involvement, and arthralgia/arthritis (p=0.006). The participants mostly used the Google (86%) and Facebook (%41). More than half the participants (62.8%) expected dermatologists to inform society that psoriasis is not contagious.

Conclusion: The internet and SM being widely available and offering substantial information to be easily accessed make it very attractive for patients to use these platforms to investigate diseases, including psoriasis. If what is presented on SM conflicts with what the physician says, patients mostly trust the latter, but at the same time, they tend not to share the results of their online inquiries with their physicians.

References

1 Ljubenovic M, Lazarevic V, Golubovic M, Binic I. Integrative approach to psoriasis vulgaris. Holist Nurs Pract 2018; 32(3):133–139.
2 Oji V, Luger TA. The skin in psoriasis: assessment and challenges. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2015; 33 (5 Suppl 93): S14–19.
3 Grajales FJ 3rd, Sheps S, Ho K, Novak-Lauscher H, Eysenbach G. SM: a review and tutorial of applications in medicine and health care. J Med Internet Res 2014; 16(2): e13.
4 AlGhamdi KM, Moussa NA. Internet use by the public to search for health-related information. Int J Med Inform 2012; 81(6): 363–373.
5 Gantenbein L, Navarini AA, Maul LV, Brandt O, Mueller SM. Internet and SM use in dermatology patients: search behavior and impact on patient-physician relationship. Dermatol Ther 2020; 33(6): e14098.
6 Alpsoy E, Polat M, FettahlıoGlu-Karaman B, et al. Internalized stigma in psoriasis: A multicenter study. J Dermatol 2017; 44(8): 885–891.
7 Finlay AY, Khan GK. Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI)--a simple practical measure for routine clinical use. Clin Exp Dermatol 1994; 19(3): 210–216.
8 Oztürkcan S, Ermertcan AT, Eser E, Sahin MT. Cross validation of the Turkish version of dermatology life quality index. Int J Dermatol 2006; 45(11): 1300–1307.
9 Eysenbach G, Kohler C. What is the prevalence of health-related searches on the World Wide Web? Qualitative and quantitative analysis of search engine queries on the Internet. AMIA Annu Symp Proc 2003; 225–229.
10 Albeshri M, Alharithy R, Altalhab S, Alluhayyan OB, Farhat AM. The influence of modern SM on dermatologist selection by patients. Cureus 2020; 12(12): e11822.
11 Reich J, Guo L, Groshek J, et al. SM use and preferences in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2019; 25(3): 587–591.
12 Kardeş S. Seasonal variation in the internet searches for psoriasis. Arch Dermatol Res 2019; 311(6): 461–467.
13 Yousaf A, Hagen R, Delaney E, Davis S, Zinn Z. The influence of SM on acne treatment: a cross-sectional survey. Pediatr Dermatol. 2020; 37(2): 301–304.
14 Miller MP, Arefanian S, Blatnik JA. The impact of internet-based patient self-education of surgical mesh on patient attitudes and healthcare decisions prior to hernia surgery. Surg Endosc 2020; 34(11): 5132–5141.
15 Bender JL, Hueniken K, Eng L, et al. Internet and SM use in cancer patients: association with distress and perceived benefits and limitations. Support Care Cancer 2021. doi: 10.1007/s00520-021-06077-0. [Last accessed: August 27, 2021].
16 Dumas AA, Lapointe A, Desroches S. Users, uses, and effects of SM in dietetic practice: scoping review of the quantitative and qualitative evidence. J Med Internet Res 2018; 20(2): e55.
17 Perrin A. (2015) Social Networking Usage: 2005-2015. Pew Research Center. Available from: http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/10/08/2015/Social-Networking-Usage-2005-2015/ [Last accessed: August 27, 2021].
18 Fox S. (2005) Health information online. Pew Research Center. Available from: https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2005/05/17/health-information-online/ [Last accessed: August 27, 2021].
19 Greenwood S, Perrin A, Duggan M. (2016) SM Update 2016. Pew Research Center. Available from: https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2016/11/11/social-media-update-2016/ [Last accessed: August 27, 2021].
20 Niu Z, Willoughby J, Zhou R. Associations of health literacy, SM use, and self-efficacy with health information-seeking intentions among SM users in china: cross-sectional survey. J Med Internet Res. 2021; 23(2): e19134.
21 Zhao J, Han H, Zhong B, Xie W, Chen Y, Zhi M. Health information on SM helps mitigate Crohn's disease symptoms and improves patients' clinical course. Comput Human Behav 2021; 115: 106588.
22 Kim WB, Jerome D, Yeung J. Diagnosis and management of psoriasis. Can Fam Physician 2017; 63(4): 278–285.
23 Russo PA, Ilchef R, Cooper AJ. Psychiatric morbidity in psoriasis: a review. Australas J Dermatol 2004; 45(3): 155–159.

Downloads

Published

2022-07-28

Issue

Section

Original Article

How to Cite

1.
Aslan Kayıran M, Karadağ AS, Oğuz Topal İlteriş, et al. Habits of using social media and the internet in psoriasis patients. Dermatol Pract Concept. 2022;12(3):e2022143. doi:10.5826/dpc.1203a143

Share