Dermoscopy Training Effect on Diagnostic Accuracy of Skin Lesions in Canadian Family Medicine Physicians Using the Triage Amalgamated Dermoscopic Algorithm
Keywords:
dermoscopy, family/general practice, skin cancer, medical education, Triage Amalgamated Dermoscopic AlgorithmAbstract
Background: Accurate identification of cutaneous lesions is an essential skill for family medicine physicians (FMPs). Studies show significant improvement in skin cancer detection with dermoscopy use. Frontline FMPs are an ideal target group for dermoscopy training. The 3-step Triage Amalgamated Dermoscopic Algorithm (TADA) facilitates high sensitivity and specificity for pigmented and nonpigmented skin lesions. Step I requires unequivocal identification of dermoscopic features for 1 of 3 benign skin lesions: angioma, dermatofibroma, or seborrheic keratosis. If absent, steps II and III are applied assessing for features of architectural disorder and malignancies with organized, symmetric patterns, respectively.
Objective: To assess FMPs’ diagnostic accuracy of benign and malignant skin lesions before and after training in TADA step I.
Methods: In this repeated-measures observational study, 33 dermoscopy-naive FMPs attending an introductory dermoscopy workshop each assessed gross and corresponding dermoscopic photographic images of 50 pigmented and nonpigmented skin lesions (23 benign, 27 malignant) for features of TADA step I lesions before and after training. Analyses compared diagnostic accuracy in relation to training and baseline physician characteristics.
Results: Diagnostic accuracy improved from 76.4% to 90.8% (P < 0.001) and from 85.0% to 90.0% (P = 0.01), respectively, for all lesions and for all TADA I lesions. Female sex was significant as a predictor of individual posttraining performance (all lesions combined, P = 0.02).
Conclusions: Results show significant improvement in diagnostic accuracies for benign and malignant skin lesions with introductory dermoscopy training using TADA step I. This will reduce unnecessary benign lesion excision and enhance referral sensitivity, conserving specialist resources.
References
Canadian Cancer Society. Melanoma skin cancer statistics, 2018. Available at: http://www.cancer.ca/en/cancer-information/cancer-type/skin-melanoma/statistics/?region=on. Accessed November 1, 2018.
Canadian Cancer Society, Statistics Canada. Canadian Cancer Statistics 2017. Public Health Agency of Canada/Territorial Registries. Available at: http://www.cancer.ca/~/media/cancer.ca/CW/cancer%20information/cancer%20101/Canadian%20cancer%20statistics/Canadian-Cancer-Statistics-2017-EN.pdf?la=en. Accessed September 15, 2017.
Maguiness S, Searles GE, From L, Swiggum S. The Canadian Dermatology Workforce Survey: implications for the future of Canadian dermatology—who will be your skin expert? J Cutan Med Surg. 2004;8(3):141-147.
Argenziano G, Puig S, Zalaudek I, et al. Dermoscopy improves the accuracy of primary care physicians to triage lesions suggestive of skin cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(12):1877-1882.
Bafounta ML, Beauchet A, Aegerter P, Saiag P. Is dermoscopy (epiluminescence microscopy) useful for the diagnosis of melanoma? Results of a meta-analysis using techniques adapted to the evaluation of diagnostic tests. Arch Dermatol. 2001;137(10):1343-1350.
Stanganelli I, Serafini M, Bucchi L. A cancer-registry-assisted evaluation of the accuracy of digital epiluminescence microscopy associated with clinical examination of pigmented skin lesions. Dermatology. 2000;200(1):11-16.
Rosendahl C, Cameron A, McColl I, Wilkinson D. Dermatoscopy in routine practice—“chaos and clues.” Australian Fam Physician. 2012;41(7):482-487.
Carli P, Quercioli E, Sestini S, et al. Pattern analysis, not simplified algorithms, is the most reliable method for teaching dermoscopy for melanoma diagnosis to residents in dermatology. Br J Dermatol. 2003;148(5):981-984.
Dolianitis C, Kelly J, Wolfe R, Simpson P. Comparative performance of 4 dermoscopic algorithms by nonexperts for the diagnosis of melanocytic lesions. Arch Dermatol. 2005;141(8):1008-1014.
Rogers T, Marino ML, Dusza SW, et al. A clinical aid for detecting skin cancer: the Triage Amalgamated Dermoscopic Algorithm (TADA). J Am Board Fam Med. 2016;29(6):694-701.
Rogers T, Marino M, Dusza SW, Bajaj S, Marchetti MA, Marghoob A. Triage amalgamated dermoscopic algorithm (TADA) for skin cancer screening. Dermatol Pract Concept. 2017;7(2):39-46.
Jaimes N, Marghoob AA. Dermlite® TADA algorithm card. August 2015.
Wizard Pro for Mac, version 1.9.36, available at wizardmac.com.
Mordkoff J T. The assumption(s) of normality. Available at: http://www2.psychology.uiowa.edu/faculty/mordkoff/GradStats/part%201/I.07%20normal.pdf. Accessed Oct 20, 2019.
Canadian Skin Patient Alliance. Skin deep: a report card on access to dermatologic care and treatment in canada-2012. Available at: http://www.canadianskin.ca/en/docman/report-card/english/national/1-national-report-card/file. Accessed September 15, 2017.
Canadian Medical Association Specialty Profiles. Dermatology. Available at: https://www.cma.ca/sites/default/files/2019-01/dermatology-e.pdf. Accessed May 25, 2019.
Canadian Medical Association Specialty Profiles. Family medicine. Available at: https://www.cma.ca/sites/default/files/2019-01/family-e.pdf. Accessed May 25, 2019.
Borretta L, Green P. Dermatology in undergraduate medical education: are we underrepresented? Available at: http://www.dermatology.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/P3_06.pdf. Accessed September 15, 2017.
Kirshen C, Shoimer I, Wismer J, DesGroseilliers JP, Lui H. Teaching dermatology to Canadian undergraduate medical students. J Cutan Med Surg. 2011;15(3):150-156.
National Dermatology Core Curriculum and Core Competencies. July 2012. Available at:
http://www.dermweb.com/dermatology_resources/national-dermatology-core-curriculum-competencies.htm. Accessed September 15, 2017.
Hu A, Vender R. Undergraduate dermatology education in Canada: a national survey. J Cutan Med Surg. 2017;22(1):31-37.
Geller AC, O’Riordan DL, Oliveria SA, Valvo S, Teich M, Halpern AC. Overcoming obstacles to skin cancer examinations and prevention counseling for high-risk patients: results of a national survey of primary care physicians. J Am Board Fam Pract. 2004:17(6):416-423.
Oliveria SA, Christos PJ, Marghoob AA, Halpern AC. Skin cancer screening and prevention in the primary care setting: national ambulatory medical care survey 1997. J Gen Intern Med. 2001;16(5): 297-301.
Federman DG, Concato J, Caralis PV, Hunkele GE, Kirsner RS. Screening for skin cancer in primary care settings. Arch Dermatol. 1997;133(11):1423-1425.
Vestergaard ME, Macaskill P, Holt PE, Menzies SW. Dermoscopy compared with naked eye examination for the diagnosis of primary melanoma: a meta-analysis of studies performed in a clinical setting. Br J Dermatol. 2008;159(3):669-676.
Westerhoff K, McCarthy WH, Menzies SW. Increase in the sensitivity for melanoma diagnosis by primary care physicians using skin surface microscopy. Br J Dermatol. 2000;143(5):1016-1120.
Federman DG, Kravetz JD, Kirsner RS. Skin cancer screening by dermatologists: prevalence and barriers. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2002;46(5):710-714.
Apalla Z, Lallas A, Argenziano G, et al. The light and the dark of dermatoscopy in the early diagnosis of melanoma: facts and controversies. Clin Dermatol. 2013;31(6): 671-676.
Zaludek I, Kittler H, Marghoob AA, et al. Time required for a complete skin examination with and without dermoscopy: a prospective randomized multicenter study. Arch Dermatol. 2008; 44(4):509-513.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Dermatology Practical & Conceptual applies a Creative Commons Attribution License (CCAL) to all works we publish (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/). Authors retain the copyright for their published work.
