“Twin lesions”: Which one is the bad one? Improvement of clinical diagnosis with reflectance confocal microscopy

“Twin lesions”: Which one is the bad one? Improvement of clinical diagnosis with reflectance confocal microscopy

Authors

  • Secil Saral Department of Dermatology and Allergology, Ludwig-Maximilian University, Munich, Germany & Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey
  • Daniela Hartmann Department of Dermatology and Allergology, Ludwig-Maximilian University, Munich, Germany. Städtisches Klinikum München, Fachklinik für Dermatologie und Allergologie, Munich, Germany
  • Valerie Letulè Department of Dermatology and Allergology, Ludwig-Maximilian University, Munich, Germany & Städtisches Klinikum München, Fachklinik für Dermatologie und Allergologie, Munich, Germany
  • Thomas Ruzicka Department of Dermatology and Allergology, Ludwig-Maximilian University, Munich, Germany
  • Cristel Ruini Department of Dermatology and Allergology, Ludwig-Maximilian University, Munich, Germany & Städtisches Klinikum München, Fachklinik für Dermatologie und Allergologie, Munich, Germany
  • Tanja von Braunmühl Department of Dermatology and Allergology, Ludwig-Maximilian University, Munich, Germany & Städtisches Klinikum München, Fachklinik für Dermatologie und Allergologie, Munich, Germany

Keywords:

reflectance confocal microscopy, skin imaging, clinical diagnosis, dermatoscopy, nevus, melanoma

Abstract

Background: In vivo reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) is a novel non-invasive diagnostic tool, which is used to differentiate skin lesions. Even in lesions with similar dermatoscopic images, RCM may improve diagnostic accuracy.

Methods: Three sets of false ‘’twin lesions’’ with similar macroscopic and dermatoscopic images are matched. All lesions are evaluated with RCM and lesions are excised for further evaluation. Corresponding features in confocal images, dermatoscopy and histopathology are discussed.

Results: In all matched pairs, one of the lesions was diagnosed as melanoma with the observation of melanoma findings such as: epidermal disarray, pagetoid cells in epidermis and cellular atypia at the junction. Benign lesions were differentiated easily with RCM imaging. 

Conclusion: Examining dermatoscopically difficult and/or similar lesions with RCM facilitates diagnostic and therapeutic decision making. Using RCM in daily practice may contribute to a decrease in unnecessary excisions.

Author Biographies

Cristel Ruini, Department of Dermatology and Allergology, Ludwig-Maximilian University, Munich, Germany & Städtisches Klinikum München, Fachklinik für Dermatologie und Allergologie, Munich, Germany

senior author

Tanja von Braunmühl, Department of Dermatology and Allergology, Ludwig-Maximilian University, Munich, Germany & Städtisches Klinikum München, Fachklinik für Dermatologie und Allergologie, Munich, Germany

Senior author

Downloads

Published

2017-02-02

Issue

Section

Research

How to Cite

1.
“Twin lesions”: Which one is the bad one? Improvement of clinical diagnosis with reflectance confocal microscopy. Dermatol Pract Concept [Internet]. 2017 Feb. 2 [cited 2024 May 12];. Available from: https://dpcj.org/index.php/dpc/article/view/dermatol-pract-concept-articleid-dp0701a02

Share