Evaluation of Diagnostic Accuracy and Therapeutic Approach of Dermatologists and Plastic Surgeons to Non-Melanocytic Skin Lesions by Using Telemedicine
Diagnostic Accuracy and Therapeutic Approach of Dermatologists and Plastic Surgeons
Keywords:
telemedicine, teledermatology, teledermoscopy, non-melanocytic skin lesion, diagnostic accuracyAbstract
Background: In the new circumstances of Coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, teledermatology and teledermoscopy have become more important in daily practice for departments which visuality is at the forefront as dermatology and plastic and reconstructive surgery.
Objective: In this study, it is aimed to determine diagnostic accuracy and treatment approaches of non-melanocytic skin lesions between two clinics by store and forward teledermatology method and to evaluate the contribution of teledermoscopy to the diagnostic accuracy of dermatologists.
Methods: A total of 26 patients with non-melanocytic skin lesions were included to the study. Clinical images of the lesions were sent by email to three plastic surgeons and three dermatologists. The accuracy of the diagnoses were evaluated by comparing teledermatology with histopathology. Diagnosis and treatment approaches were recorded for both clinics. Dermatologists also defined their diagnosis with teledermoscopic images.
Results: The mean percentage of diagnostic accuracy among dermatologists’ was 74.3% and among plastic surgeons’ was 61.5%. There was no significant difference in diagnostic accuracy between departments (p=0.625). There was a statistically significant difference between the departments for diagnostic and treatment approaches (p values respectively p=0.002, p<0.001). Plastic surgeons prefered to confirm their pre-diagnosis histopathologically more than dermatologists. Plastic surgeons recommended surgical procedures for 25 lesions (96.2%) while dermatologists for 14 (53.8%) lesions. Teledermoscopy increased the rate of diagnostic accuracy of dermatologists from 74,3% to 82%.
Conclusions: Teledermatology is an effective method for non-melanocytic skin lesions with high diagnostic accuracy. Adding dermoscopy to teledermatology increases diagnostic accuracy of dermatologists on non-melanocytic skin lesions.
References
1. Vyas KS, Hambrick HR, Shakir A, et al. A systematic review of the use of telemedicine in plastic and reconstructive surgery and dermatology. Ann Plast Surg 2017; 78: 736-768. PMID: 28328635. DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000001044.
2. Fabbrocini G, Balato A, Rescigno O, et al. Telediagnosis and face-to-face diagnosis reliability for melanocytic and non-melanocytic 'pink' lesions. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2008;22:229-234. PMID: 18211418. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2007.02400.x
3. Trettel A, Eissing L and Augustin M. Telemedicine in dermatology: findings and experiences worldwide - a systematic literature review. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2018; 32: 215-224. PMID: 28516492. DOI: 10.1111/jdv.14341.
4. Gardiner S and Hartzell TL. Telemedicine and plastic surgery: a review of its applications, limitations and legal pitfalls. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2012; 65: e47-53. PMID: 22178033. DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2011.11.048.
5. Fonseca AS, Goldenberg DC, Stocchero GF, et al. Validation of videoconference with smartphones in telemedicine facial trauma care: analysis of concordance to on-site evaluation. Ann Plast Surg 2016; 77: 433-437. PMID: 26418788. DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0000000000000623.
6. Holt B, Faraklas I, Theurer L, et al. Telemedicine use among burn centers in the United States: a survey. J Burn Care Res 2012; 33: 157-162. PMID: 22105096. DOI: 10.1097/BCR.0b013e31823d0b68.
7. Syed-Abdul S, Scholl J, Chen CC, et al. Telemedicine utilization to support the management of the burns treatment involving patient pathways in both developed and developing countries: a case study. J Burn Care Res 2012; 33: e207-212. PMID: 22249104. DOI: 10.1097/BCR.0b013e318241b6b7.
8. Hee Hwang J and Mun GH. An evolution of communication in postoperative free flap monitoring: using a smartphone and mobile messenger application. Plast Reconstr Surg 2012; 130: 125-129. PMID: 22743879. DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e318254b202.
9. Perednia DA and Brown NA. Teledermatology: one application of telemedicine. Bull Med Libr Assoc 1995; 83: 42-47. PMID: 7703938. PMCID: PMC225996.
10. Lee KJ, Finnane A, Soyer HP. Recent trends in teledermatology and teledermoscopy. Dermatol Pract Concept. 2018; 8: 214-223. PMID: 30116667. DOI:10.5826/dpc.0803a13
11. Warshaw EM, Lederle FA, Grill JP, et al. Accuracy of teledermatology for nonpigmented neoplasms. J Am Acad Dermatol 2009; 60: 579-588. PMID: 19217689. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2008.11.892.
12. Whited JD, Mills BJ, Hall RP, et al. A pilot trial of digital imaging in skin cancer. J Telemed Telecare 1998; 4: 108-112. PMID: 9744167. DOI: 10.1258/1357633981932046.
13. Whited JD, Hall RP, Simel DL, et al. Reliability and accuracy of dermatologists’ clinic based and digital image consultations. J Am Acad Dermatol 1999; 41: 693-702. PMID: 10534630. DOI: 10.1016/s0190-9622(99)70003-4.
14. Barnard CM and Goldyne ME. Evaluation of an asynchronous teleconsultation system for diagnosis of skin cancer and other skin diseases. Telemed J E Health 2000; 6:379-384. PMID: 11242545. DOI: 10.1089/15305620050503843.
15. Şenel E, Baba M and Durdu M. The contribution of teledermatoscopy to the diagnosis and management of non-melanocytic skin tumours. J Telemed Telecare 2013; 19 :60-63. PMID: 23422158. DOI: 10.1177/1357633X12474961.
16. Mohammad EA, Mansour M, Parichehr K, et al. Assessment of clinical diagnostic accuracy compared with pathological diagnosis of basal cell carcinoma. Indian Dermatol Online J 2015; 6: 258-262. PMID: 26225330. PMCID: PMC4513405.
17. Sönmez A, Şatır T, Sav A, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of biopsied skin lesions in dermatology and plastic surgery clinics. Eur J Plast Surg 2007; 29: 313-316. DOI: 10.1007/s00238-007-0108-z.
18. Sellheyer K and Bergfeld WF. A retrospective biopsy study of the clinical diagnostic accuracy of common skin diseases by different specialties compared with dermatology. J Am Acad Dermatol 2005; 52: 823-830. PMID: 15858472. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2004.11.072.
19. Trovato MJ, Scholer AJ, Vallejo E, et al. eConsultation in plastic and reconstructive surgery. Eplasty 2011; 11: e48. PMID: 22140594. PMCID: PMC3228577.
20. Giavina-Bianchi M, Azevedo MFD, Sousa R, et al. Part II: Accuracy of teledermatology in skin neoplasms. Front Med (Lausanne) 2020; 7: 598903. PMID: 33330564. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2020.598903.
21. Stone CA and Downs AMR. Diagnostic accuracy of skin lesions amongst plastic surgeons and a dermatologist. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2017; 31: e533-e534. PMID: 28609605. DOI: 10.1111/jdv.14398.
22. Matteucci P, Pinder R, Magdum A, et al. Accuracy in skin lesion diagnosis and the exclusion of malignancy. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2011; 64: 1460-1465. PMID: 21741335. DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2011.06.017.
23. Hallock GG and Lutz DA. Prospective study of the accuracy of the surgeon's diagnosis in 2000 excised skin tumors. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998; 101:1255-1261. PMID: 9529210. DOI: 10.1097/00006534-199804050-00014.
24. Sola-Ortigosa J, Muñoz-Santos C, Masat-Ticó T, et al. The role of teledermatology and teledermoscopy in the diagnosis of actinic keratosis and field cancerization. J Invest Dermatol 2020; 140: 1976-1984. PMID: 32142799. DOI: 10.1016/j.jid.2020.02.013.
25. Braun RP, Meier ML, Pelloni F, et al. Teledermatoscopy in Switzerland: A preliminary evaluation. J Am Acad Dermatol 2000; 42: 770-775. PMID: 10775852. DOI: 10.1067/mjd.2000.103977.
26. Marchetti A, Dalle S, Maucort-Boulch D, et al. Diagnostic concordance in tertiary (dermatologists-to-experts) teledermoscopy: a final diagnosis-based study on 290 cases. Dermatol Pract Concept. 2020; 10(3): e2020071. PMID: 32642316. DOI: 10.5826/dpc.1003a71.
27. Ferrandiz L, Moreno-Ramirez D, Nieto-Garcia, et al. Teledermatology-based presurgical management for nonmelanoma skin cancer: a pilot study. Dermatol Surg 2007; 33: 1092-1098. PMID: 17760600. DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2007.33223.x.
28. Bilgili ME, Yildiz H, Cengiz BP, et al. Effect of preoperative evaluation by a dermatologist on diagnostic accuracy. Dermatol Surg 2014; 40: 1402-1408. PMID: 25350124. DOI: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000000168.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Burcu Tugrul, Basak Yalici-Armagan, Hatice Gamze Demirdag, Ozge Gunduz
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Dermatology Practical & Conceptual applies a Creative Commons Attribution License (CCAL) to all works we publish (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/). Authors retain the copyright for their published work.
How to Cite
Share
