Diagnosis and differential diagnosis of Poikiloderma of Civatte: a Dermoscopy Cohort Study

Diagnosis and differential diagnosis of Poikiloderma of Civatte: a Dermoscopy Cohort Study

Authors

  • Alexander Katoulis 2nd Department of Dermatology and Venereology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Medical School, “Attikon” General University Hospital, Athens, Greece.
  • Dimitrios Sgouros 2nd Department of Dermatology and Venereology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Medical School, “Attikon” General University Hospital, Athens, Greece.
  • Evangelia Bozi 2nd Department of Dermatology and Venereology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Medical School, “Attikon” General University Hospital, Athens, Greece.
  • Georgia Pappa 2nd Department of Dermatology and Venereology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Medical School, “Attikon” General University Hospital, Athens, Greece.
  • Sofia Theotokoglou 2nd Department of Dermatology and Venereology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Medical School, “Attikon” General University Hospital, Athens, Greece.
  • Marie Pauline Konstantinou 2nd Department of Dermatology and Venereology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Medical School, “Attikon” General University Hospital, Athens, Greece.
  • Alexandra Voudouri 2nd Department of Dermatology and Venereology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Medical School, “Attikon” General University Hospital, Athens, Greece.
  • Maria Voudouri 2nd Department of Dermatology and Venereology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Medical School, “Attikon” General University Hospital, Athens, Greece.
  • Melpomeni Theofili 2nd Department of Dermatology and Venereology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Medical School, “Attikon” General University Hospital, Athens, Greece.
  • Korina Tzima 2nd Department of Dermatology and Venereology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Medical School, “Attikon” General University Hospital, Athens, Greece.
  • Rainer Hofmann-Wellenhof Department of Dermatology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria

Keywords:

poikiloderma, dermoscopy, epidemiology, diagnosis, differential diagnosis

Abstract

Introduction: Poikiloderma of Civatte (PC) is a common, acquired, chronic, benign poikiloderma of the neck and face, most commonly affecting menopausal females. Until the day of writing, few have been published regarding dermoscopy of PC.

Objective: To describe the dermoscopic picture of PC, so as to provide a clinico-dermoscopic diagnosis and differential diagnosis for PC.

Methods: Twenty-eight patients with PC, aged 26-73 years, of whom 19 females (67.86%) were evaluated by detailed history, clinical examination, and dermoscopic examination with hand-held dermatoscope. 

Results: The reticular pattern was observed in 15 cases (53.6%); the white dot in 10 (35.7%); the non-specific in 9 (32.1%); and the spaghetti and meatballs-like in 8 (28.6%). Regarding local dermoscopic features, flying seagull-like vessels were observed in 18 cases (64.3%); linear irregular vessels in 17 (60.7%); rhomboidal/polygonal vessels in 15 (53.6%); dotted/globular vessels in 10 (35.7%); white macules in 23 (82.1%); brown macules in 11 (39.3%); and whitish follicular plugs in 6 (21.4%).

Conclusions: The dermoscopic picture of PC is highly characteristic and corresponds well to both clinical and histological findings. Dermoscopy may assist clinical diagnosis, as well as the differentiation from other dermatoses of the neck and face, especially poikilodermas with guarded prognosis.

Author Biography

Alexander Katoulis, 2nd Department of Dermatology and Venereology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Medical School, “Attikon” General University Hospital, Athens, Greece.

Associate Professor of Dermatology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Medical School

References

Katoulis AC, Rigopoulos D, Tzima K, Stavrianeas NG. Poikiloderma of Civatte: a review. Exp Rev Dermatol 2012; 7:377-382.

Katoulis AC, Stavrianeas NG. Poikiloderma of Civatte. In: Hyperpigmentation, Rigopoulos D, Katoulis AC (Eds.). CRC Press, Boca Raton Florida, 2018, p.p. 62-65.

Katoulis AC, Stavrianeas NG, Panayiotides JG et al. Poikiloderma of Civatte: a histopathological and ultrastructural study. Dermatology 2007; 214:177-182.

Kittler H, Marghoob AA, Argenziano G, et al. Standardization in Dermoscopy/Dermatoscopy: Results of the third consensus conference of the International Society of Dermoscopy. J Am Acad Dermatol 2016; 74:1093-1106.

Errichetti E, Stinco G. Dermoscopy in General Dermatology: a practical overview. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb) 2016; 6:471-507.

Sgouros D, Apalla Z, Ioannides D, et al. Dermoscopy of common inflammatory disorders. Dermatol Clin 2018; 36:359-368.

Errichetti E, Stinco G. Dermoscopy in facilitating the recognition of poikiloderma of Civatte. Dermatol Surg 2018; 44:446-447.

Lallas A, Argenziano G, Apalla Z, et al. Dermoscopic patterns of common facial inflammatory skin diseases. J Eur Acad Dermatol 2014; 28:60-614.

Lallas A, Argenziano G, Longo C, et al. Polygonal vessels of rosacea are highlighted by dermoscopy. Int J Dermatol 2014; 53:e325-327.

Katoulis AC, Georgala S, Stavrianeas NG. Poikiloderma of Civatte and rosacea: Variants in the same nosological spectrum. Dermatology 2005; 211:386-387.

Wang L, Xu AE. Four views of Riehl’s melanosis: clinical appearance, dermoscopy, confocal microscopy and histopathology. J Eur Acad Dermatol 2014; 28:1199-1206.

Maouni S, El Anzi O, Sqalli A, et al. Erythromelanosis follicularis faciei et colli: dermoscopy and dermatopathology correlates. JAAD Case Rep 2019; 5:535-536.

Sonthalia S, Jha AK, Langar S. Dermoscopy of melasma. Indian Dermatol Online J 2017; 8:525-526.

Yalamanchili R, Shastry V, Betkerur J. Clinico-epidemiologic study of quality of life assessment in melasma. Indian J Dermatol 2015; 60:519.

Sarkar R, Arora P, Garg VK, et al. Melasma update. Indian Dermatol Online J 2014; 5:426-435.

Barcaui CB, Pereira FBC, Tamler C, Fonseca RMR. Classification of melasma by dermoscopy: comparative study with Wood’s lamp. Surg Cosm Dermatol 2009; 1:115-119.

Hasegawa M. Use of dermoscopy in the evaluation of connective tissue diseases. Dermatol Clin Res (DCR ) 2015; 1(3): 41-48

Kaminska-Winciorek G, Czerw T, Kruzel T, Giebel S. Dermoscopic follow-up of the skin towards acute graft-versus-host-disease in patients after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Biomed Res Int 2016; 4535717.

Lallas A, Apalla Z, Lefaki I, et al. Dermoscopy of early stage mycosis fungoides. J Eur Acad Dermatol 2013; 27:617–621.

Mahajan VK, Chauhan PS, Mehta KS, Sharma AL. Poikiloderma vasculare atrophicans: a distinct clinical entity? Indian J Dermatol 2015; 60: 216.

Errichetti E, Stinco G. Usefuleness of Dermoscopy in poikiloderma atrophicans et vasculare/ parakeratosis variegata. Eur J Dermatol 2016: 26:300-302.

Errichetti E, Stinco G. The practical usefulness of dermoscopy in general dermatology. G Ital Dermatol Venereol 2015; 150: 533-546.

Xu P, Cheng T. Dermoscopy of poikilodermatous mycosis fungoides (MF). J Am Acad Dearmatol 2016; 74:e45-47.

Downloads

Published

2023-01-31

Issue

Section

Original Article

How to Cite

1.
Katoulis A, Sgouros D, Bozi E, et al. Diagnosis and differential diagnosis of Poikiloderma of Civatte: a Dermoscopy Cohort Study. Dermatol Pract Concept. 2023;13(1):e2023007. doi:10.5826/dpc.1301a7

Share