What Do Patients Want To See On Social Media? Evidence From A Two-Year Experiment

Leire Barrutia; Jes´ús Vega-Gutiérrez; Alba Santamarina-Albertos

doi:10.5826/dpc.1301a20

What Do Patients Want To See On Social Media? Evidence From A Two-Year Experiment

Authors

Leire Barrutia Dermatology, Medicine and Toxicology Department, University of Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain; Dermatology Department, Clinical University Hospital of Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain
Jes´ús Vega-Gutiérrez Dermatology, Medicine and Toxicology Department, University of Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain; Dermatology Department, Río Hortega University Hospital, Valladolid, Spain
Alba Santamarina-Albertos Dermatology, Medicine and Toxicology Department, University of Valladolid; Dermatology Department, Clinical University Hospital of Valladolid.

Keywords:

social media, internet, social networks, acne, health promotion, education

Abstract

Introduction: Dermatological information on social media is dominated by misleading and potentially harmful content from nonexperts. Literature suggests that, to address this issue, dermatologists should develop an online presence. However, successful presence of dermatologists on social media has been criticized for focusing on cosmetic dermatology and not representing the broad spectrum of the specialty.

Objectives: The aim of this study was to systematically analyze which dermatological topics interest the public most, and to find out whether it is feasible for a dermatologist to become influential on social media while presenting all dermatological topics equally.

Methods: The study was performed on an educational dermatology YouTube channel. The 101 videos published in a two-year period were divided into cosmetic (51 videos) and medical dermatology (50 videos). Student’s t-test was conducted to determine whether there were significant differences in views. Medical dermatology videos were then classified into three categories: Acne, facial dermatoses (excluding acne) and other dermatological diseases. A Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare these three categories and cosmetic dermatology.

Results: When comparing cosmetic and medical dermatology, no significant differences were found. When comparing the four categories, cosmetic dermatology and acne were found to generate significantly more views that other dermatological diseases.

Conclusions: The public seems to be particularly interested in cosmetic dermatology and acne. This might make it challenging to become successful on social media while presenting a balanced portray of dermatology. However, focusing on popular topics can provide a real chance to be influential and protect vulnerable people from misinformation.

References

Guzman AK, Barbieri JS. Comment on "Dermatologists in social media: A study on top influencers, posts, and user engagement". J Am Acad Dermatol. 2022;86(2):e49-e50. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2020.03.118

Sierro TJ, Young PM, Kassabian SK, Wu KK, Armstrong AW. Reply to: "Comment on 'Dermatologists in social media: A study on top influencers, posts, and user engagement'". J Am Acad Dermatol. 2022;86(2):e51. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2020.03.118

Park JH, Christman MP, Linos E, et al. Dermatology on Instagram: An Analysis of Hashtags. J Drugs Dermatol. 2018;17:482-484.

Mueller SM, Jungo P, Cajacob L, et al. The Absence of Evidence is Evidence of Non-Sense: Cross-Sectional Study on the Quality of Psoriasis-Related Videos on YouTube and Their Reception by Health Seekers. J Med Internet Res. 2019; 21: e11935. Published 2019 Jan 16. doi:10.2196/11935

Güder S, Güder H. "Mole removal" on Instagram hashtags: a cross-sectional analysis: nevus treatment methods on ınstagram. Dermatol Pract Concept. 2022;12(1):e2022066. doi:10.5826/dpc.1201a66

Iglesias-Puzas Á, Conde-Taboada A, Aranegui-Arteaga B, et al. ‘Fake news’ in dermatology. Results from an observational, cross-sectional study. Int J Dermatol. 2021;60:358-362. doi:10.1111/ijd.15254

Freemyer B, Drozd B, Suarez A. A cross-sectional study of YouTube videos about atopic dermatitis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2018;78:612-613. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2017.09.005.

Gorrepati PL, Smith GP. A Cross-Sectional Study Analyzing the Quality of YouTube Videos as a Source of Patient Education for Treatments on Psoriasis. J Psoriasis Psoriatic Arthritis. 2021;6:8-11. doi:10.1080/09546634.2019.1597247

Zheng DX, Ning AY, Levoska MA, Xiang L, Wong C, Scott JF. Acne and social media: A cross-sectional study of content quality on TikTok. Pediatr Dermatol. 2021;38(1):336-338. doi:10.1111/pde.14471

Yousaf A, Hagen R, Delaney E, Davis S, Zinn Z. The influence of social media on acne treatment: A cross-sectional survey. Pediatr Dermatol. 2020;37(2):301-304. doi:10.1111/pde.14091

Sierro TJ, Young PM, Kassabian SK, Wu KK, Armstrong AW. Dermatologists in social media: A study on top influencers, posts, and user engagement. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020;83(5):1452-1455. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2020.03.001

Sun HY, Sebaratnam DF. Medical dermatologists on social media: a call to action. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2021;84(3):e163-e164. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2020.10.040

Ranpariya V, Chu B, Fathy R, Lipoff JB. Instagram influencer definitions and the need for dermatologist engagement on social media. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020;83(6):e449-e450. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2020.07.100

Green J, Britten N. Qualitative research and evidence based medicine. BMJ. 1998;316(7139):1230-1232. doi:10.1136/bmj.316.7139.1230

Militello M, Yang RA, Anderson JB, Szeto MD, Presley CL, Laughter MR. Social media and ethical challenges for the dermatologist [published online ahead of print, 2021 Sep 13]. Curr Dermatol Rep. 2021;1-8. doi:10.1007/s13671-021-00340-7.

Kim TK, Park JH. More about the basic assumptions of t-test: normality and sample size. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2019;72(4):331-335. doi:10.4097/kja.d.18.00292

Orion E, Wolf R. Psychologic consequences of facial dermatoses. Clin Dermatol. 2014;32(6):767-771. doi:10.1016/j.clindermatol.2014.02.016.

Kouris A, Platsidaki E, Christodoulou C, et al. Patients' self-esteem before and after chemical peeling procedure. J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2018;20(4):220-222. doi:10.1080/14764172.2017.1400168

van Zuuren EJ, Arents BWM, van der Linden MMD, Vermeulen S, Fedorowicz Z, Tan J. Rosacea: New Concepts in Classification and Treatment. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2021;22(4):457-465. doi:10.1007/s40257-021-00595-7.

Szmuda T, Syed MT, Singh A, Ali S, Özdemir C, Słoniewski P. YouTube as a source of patient information for Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19): A content-quality and audience engagement analysis. Rev Med Virol. 2020;30(5):e2132. doi:10.1002/rmv.2132

MarketingCharts. YouTube Influencer Engagement Rate Benchmarks: What Are Good Rates? Available at: https://www.marketingcharts.com/digital/video-112775#:~:text=Per%20the%20report%2C%20metrics%20that,considered%20to%20have%20good%20performance. Last accessed 15 February 2022.

Roche L, Nic Dhonncha E, Murphy M. TikTok™ and dermatology: promises and pearls. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2021;46:737-739. doi:10.1111/ced.14529.

Hossler EW, Conroy MP. YouTube as a source of information on tanning bed use. Arch Dermatol. 2008;144:1395-1396. doi:10.1001/archderm.144.10.1395.

Ricklefs CA, Asdigian NL, Kalra HL, et al. Indoor tanning promotions on social media in six US cities #UVTanning #tanning. Transl Behav Med. 2016;6:260-270. doi:10.1007/s13142-015-0378-0.

Janda M, Soyer HP. Using mobile health technology and social media for the prevention and early detection of skin cancer. Dermatology. 2020;236:72-74. doi:10.1159/000505150.

Wehner MR, Chren MM, Shive ML, et al. Twitter: an opportunity for public health campaigns. Lancet. 2014;384:131-132. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61161-2.

Stekelenburg N, Horsham C, O'Hara M, et al. Using social media to determine the affective and cognitive components of tweets about sunburn. Dermatology. 2020;236:75-80. doi:10.1159/000506102.

Correia O, Duarte AF, Del Marmol V, et al. Euromelanoma in Portugal. How useful was the Euromelanoma campaign between 2010 and 2017? Int J Dermatol. 2018; 57:e85-e88. doi: 10.1111/ijd.14179.

De La Garza H, Maymone MBC, Vashi NA. Impact of Social Media on Skin Cancer Prevention. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 May 9;18(9):5002. doi:10.3390/ijerph18095002.

Tamminga MA, Lipoff JB. Understanding sunscreen and photoprotection misinformation on parenting blogs: A mixed-method study. Pediatr Dermatol. 2021;38:88-91. doi:10.1111/pde.14411.

Cardwell LA, Nyckowski T, Uwakwe LN, et al. Coping Mechanisms and Resources for Patients Suffering from Rosacea. Dermatol Clin. 2018;36:171-174. doi:10.1016/j.det.2017.11.013.

Wortsman X, Ramírez-Cornejo C, Ferreira-Wortsman C, Howes R. Perspectives on the Twitter presence of hidradenitis suppurativa. Int J Dermatol. 2021 Oct;60(10):e402-e403. doi:10.1111/ijd.15631.

Sarkar U, Le GM, Lyles CR, Ramo D, Linos E, Bibbins-Domingo K. Using social media to target cancer prevention in young adults: Viewpoint. J Med Internet Res. 2018;20(6):e203. Published 2018 Jun 5. doi:10.2196/jmir.8882.

Al-Atif HM. A cross-sectional survey of knowledge of skin cancer in Saudi Arabia. Dermatol Pract Concept. 2021;11(3):e2021076. Published 2021 May 20. doi:10.5826/dpc.1103a76.

Schneiderbanger CK, Schuler G, Heinzerling L, et al. Characterization of tanning behavior assessed via online survey: Attitudes, habits, and preventive measures with focus on sunscreen use. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed. 2019;35: 268-274. doi:10.1111/phpp.12465.

Reddy PS, DeBord LC, Gupta R, et al. Antibiotics for acne vulgaris: Using Instagram to seek insight into the patient perspective. J Dermatolog Treat. 2021;32:188-192. doi:10.1080/09546634.2019.1631432.

Buntinx-Krieg T, Caravaglio J, Domozych R, et al. Dermatology on Reddit: Elucidating trends in dermatologic communications on the world wide web. Dermatol Online J 2017;23:2. 13030/qt9dr1f7x6. Published 2017 Jul 15.