Comparative Analysis of the Most Used Versus the Recently Developed Vitiligo Activity and Extent Scores and Their Change With Treatment
Keywords:
VES plus, VASI, VIDA, VSAS, vitiligo assessmentAbstract
Introduction: There are diverse assessment tools for vitiligo, with no standardized approach that helps unify treatment outcome measures. Thus, comparing different treatment modalities and developing evidence-based recommendations for vitiligo management has been quite challenging.
Objectives: We compared the most commonly used tools assessing both vitiligo activity and extent, namely, Vitiligo Disease Activity Score (VIDA) and Vitiligo Area and Severity Index (VASI) score to their newly developed counterparts, namely, Vitiligo Extent Score Plus score (VES plus) and Vitiligo Signs of Activity score (VSAS), to provide insights that would help set recommendations for a unified outcome assessment protocol for vitiligo patients.
Methods: Thirty-six active non-segmental vitiligo cases were recruited, 30 of whom completed 48 sessions of narrow band ultraviolet B (NB-UVB). Patients were assessed for both extent and activity both before and after treatment with NB-UVB. Scores were correlated. Additionally, VES plus was assessed for its reliability in comparison to VASI score.
Results: Both extent (VASI and VES plus) and activity scores (VIDA and VSAS) showed significant improvement following treatment. Additionally, VES plus and VASI were positively correlating both before and after treatment as well as their percent change. Furthermore, VES plus proved as reliable as VASI. Regarding activity scores, total, hypochromic and Koebner VSAS only correlated with VIDA following treatment. Confetti VSAS neither correlated with VIDA before nor after treatment.
Conclusions: VES plus and VASI scores have proven of comparable reliability. While examination-based VSAS score comes as an additive tool to the history-based VIDA score.
References
Simons RE, Zevy DL, Jafferany M. Psychodermatology of vitiligo: Psychological impact and consequences. Dermatol Ther. 2020;33(3):e13418. DOI: 10.1111/dth.13418. PMID: 32297399.
Bergqvist C, Ezzedine K. Vitiligo: A Review. Dermatology. 2020;236(6):571-592. DOI: 10.1159/000506103. PMID: 32155629.
Alghamdi KM, Kumar A, Taïeb A, Ezzedine K. Assessment methods for the evaluation of vitiligo. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2012;26(12):1463-1471. DOI:10.1111/j.1468-3083.2012.04505. x. PMID: 22416879.
Eleftheriadou V, Thomas KS, Whitton ME, Batchelor JM, Ravenscroft JC. Which outcomes should we measure in vitiligo? Results of a systematic review and a survey among patients and clinicians on outcomes in vitiligo trials. Br J Dermatol. 2012;167(4):804-814. DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2133.2012. 11056.x. PMID: 22591025.
Ezzedine K, Eleftheriadou V, Whitton M, van Geel N. Vitiligo. Lancet. 2015;386(9988):74-84. DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60763-7. PMID: 25596811.
Wolkerstorfer A. The long road to valid outcomes in vitiligo. Br J Dermatol. 2019;180(3):454-455. DOI:10.1111/bjd.17409. PMID: 30821367. PMCID: PMC6850450.
van Geel N, Lommerts J, Bekkenk M, et al. Development and Validation of the Vitiligo Extent Score (VES): an International Collaborative Initiative. J Invest Dermatol. 2016;136(5):978-984. DOI: 10.1016/j.jid.2015.12.040. PMID: 26827762.
van Geel N, Wolkerstorfer A, Lommerts JE, et al. Validation study of the Vitiligo Extent Score-plus. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2018;78(5):1013-1015. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2017.11.032. PMID: 29180094.
Hamzavi I, Jain H, McLean D, et al. Parametric modeling of narrowband UV-B phototherapy for vitiligo using a novel quantitative tool: the Vitiligo Area Scoring Index. Arch Dermatol. 2004; 140:677-683. DOI: 10.1001/archderm.140.6.677. PMID: 15210457.
Mogawer RM, Mostafa WZ, Elmasry MF. Comparative analysis of the body surface area calculation method used in vitiligo extent score vs the hand unit method used in vitiligo area severity index. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2020;19(10):2679-2683. DOI:10.1111/jocd.13311. PMID: 32017422.
Seneschal J, Boniface K. A Score with a VESted Interest in Vitiligo. J Invest Dermatol. 2016;136(5):902-904. DOI: 10.1016/j.jid.2016.02.006. PMID: 27107376.
Uitentuis SE, Wolkerstorfer A, Bae JM, et al. Assessing the minimal important change in the vitiligo extent score and the self-assessment vitiligo extent score. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2021;85(5):1363-1364. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2020.10.061. PMID: 33122021.
Njoo MD, Das PK, Bos JD, Westerhof W. Association of the Köbner phenomenon with disease activity and therapeutic responsiveness in vitiligo vulgaris. Arch Dermatol. 1999;135(4):407-413. DOI:10.1001/archderm.135.4.407. PMID: 10206047.
van Geel N, Passeron T, Wolkerstorfer A, Speeckaert R, Ezzedine K. Reliability and validity of the Vitiligo Signs of Activity Score (VSAS). Br J Dermatol. 2020;183(5):883-890. DOI: 10.1111/bjd.18950. PMID: 32064583. PMCID: PMC7687072.
Esmat SM, El-Mofty M, Rasheed H, et al. Efficacy of narrow band UVB with or without OMP in stabilization of vitiligo activity in skin photo-types (III-V): A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, prospective, multicenter study. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed. 2022;38(3):277-287. DOI:10.1111/phpp.12749. PMID: 34726808.
van Geel N, Desmedt V, De Schepper S, Boone B, Lapeere H, Speeckaert R. Cessation of spread as a treatment objective in vitiligo: perception from the patients' point of view. Br J Dermatol. 2016;174(4):922-924. DOI:10.1111/bjd.14283. PMID: 26556484.
Coias J, Hynan LS, Pandya AG. Lack of correlation of the patient-derived Vitiligo Disease Activity Index with the clinician-derived Vitiligo Area Scoring Index. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2018;78(5):1015-1016. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2017.11.034. PMID: 29180097.
van Geel N, Depaepe L, Vandaele V, et al. Assessing the dynamic changes in vitiligo: reliability and validity of the Vitiligo Disease Activity Score (VDAS) and Vitiligo Disease Improvement Score (VDIS). J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2022;36(8):1334-1341. DOI :10.1111/jdv.18134. PMID: 35398942; PMCID: PMC9543188.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Randa Youssef, Nourhan Emad, Rania Mogawer

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Dermatology Practical & Conceptual applies a Creative Commons Attribution License (CCAL) to all works we publish (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/). Authors retain the copyright for their published work.