Patient Ability to Take Dermoscopic Follow-Up Images of Atypical Melanocytic Lesions With Smartphones: A Pilot Study

Patient Ability to Take Dermoscopic Follow-Up Images of Atypical Melanocytic Lesions With Smartphones: A Pilot Study

Authors

  • Sofia Berglund Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8903-1054
  • John Paoli Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1326-8535
  • Petra Svensson Region Västra Götaland, Skaraborg Hospital, Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Skövde, Sweden https://orcid.org/0009-0005-5299-1162
  • Karin Terstappen Region Västra Götaland, Skaraborg Hospital, Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Skövde, Sweden https://orcid.org/0009-0002-4672-9318
  • Martin Gillstedt Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5033-5421
  • Johan Dahlén Gyllencreutz Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden

Keywords:

Teledermatology, dermoscopy, atypical melanocytic lesion, short-term monitoring, smartphone

Abstract

Introduction: Short-term teledermoscopic monitoring helps to distinguish early melanomas from nevi. As the incidence of melanoma is increasing, there are several benefits of patients taking their own dermoscopic images, but only a few previous studies have investigated the feasibility of this approach.

Objectives: We sought to examine patient ability to take evaluable dermoscopic images of atypical melanocytic lesions in need of short-term monitoring.

Methods: Patients were asked to take follow-up images in their homes using a borrowed dermoscope and their own smartphone. We investigated if the management decision differed when assessing follow-up images taken by patients compared to follow-up images taken by hospital staff. Lesions were rated as either changed, unchanged, or in need of further monitoring. In addition, image quality and patients’ attitudes towards taking dermoscopic follow-up images were studied.

Results: Ninety-five patients with 132 lesions completed the study. Images taken by hospital staff were of better quality than images taken by patients (P<0.001). A total of 24 dermoscopic images taken by patients (18.2%) were of poor quality and considered unsuitable for assessment at follow-up. In the remaining 108 lesions, the management decision was concordant in 95 cases (88.0%). Most patients found the procedure to be easy to perform and 76.0% of patients answered that they preferred self-photography.

Conclusions: Self-photography for teledermoscopic evaluation of atypical melanocytic lesions is feasible, but it results in worse image quality, which may lead to discordant evaluations. Dermoscopes used for this purpose need to be more user-friendly and maintain a higher technical standard.  

References

Balch CM, Gershenwald JE, Soong SJ, et al. Final version of 2009 AJCC melanoma staging and classification. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27(36):6199-206. DOI: 10.1200/jco.2009.23.4799. PMID: 19917835.

Altamura D, Avramidis M, Menzies SW. Assessment of the optimal interval for and sensitivity of short-term sequential digital dermoscopy monitoring for the diagnosis of melanoma. Arch Dermatol. 2008;144(4):502-6. DOI: 10.1001/archderm.144.4.502. PMID: 18427044.

Berglund S, Bogren L, Paoli J. Diagnostic accuracy and safety of short-term teledermoscopic monitoring of atypical melanocytic lesions. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2020;34(6):1233-9. DOI: 10.1111/jdv.16144. PMID: 31838783.

Menzies SW, Gutenev A, Avramidis M, Batrac A, McCarthy WH. Short-term digital surface microscopic monitoring of atypical or changing melanocytic lesions. Arch Dermatol. 2001;137(12):1583-9. DOI: PMID: 11735708.

Janda M, Horsham C, Koh U, et al. Redesigning Skin Cancer Early Detection and Care Using a New Mobile Health Application: Protocol of the SKIN Research Project, a Randomised Controlled Trial. Dermatology. 2019;235(1):11-8. DOI: 10.1159/000493729. PMID: 30404085.

Janda M, Horsham C, Vagenas D, et al. Accuracy of mobile digital teledermoscopy for skin self-examinations in adults at high risk of skin cancer: an open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Digit Health. 2020;2(3):e129-e37. DOI: 10.1016/s2589-7500(20)30001-7. PMID: 33334577.

Dahlen Gyllencreutz J, Paoli J, Bjellerup M, et al. Diagnostic agreement and interobserver concordance with teledermoscopy referrals. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2017;31(5):898-903. DOI: 10.1111/jdv.14147. PMID: 28150389.

Dahlén Gyllencreutz J, Johansson Backman E, Terstappen K, Paoli J. Teledermoscopy images acquired in primary health care and hospital settings - a comparative study of image quality. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2018;32(6):1038-43. DOI: 10.1111/jdv.14565. PMID: 28850732.

Blum A, Jaworski S. Clear differences in hand-held dermoscopes. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2006;4(12):1054-7. DOI: 10.1111/j.1610-0387.2006.06128.x. PMID: 17176414.

Wu X, Oliveria SA, Yagerman S, et al. Feasibility and Efficacy of Patient-Initiated Mobile Teledermoscopy for Short-term Monitoring of Clinically Atypical Nevi. JAMA Dermatol. 2015;151(5):489-96. DOI: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2014.3837. PMID: 25629626.

Jütte L, Yang Z, Sharma G, Roth B. Focus stacking in non-contact dermoscopy. Biomed Phys Eng Express. 2022;8(6). DOI: 10.1088/2057-1976/ac9847. PMID: 36206663.

Heratizadeh A, Fricke D, Meinhardt-Wollweber M, Roth B, Werfel T. Non-contact remote digital dermoscopy - new perspectives on differential diagnosis of inflammatory skin diseases. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2020;34(3):e125-e6. DOI: 10.1111/jdv.16056. PMID: 31710132.

Ackermann DM, Smit AK, Janda M, et al. Can patient-led surveillance detect subsequent new primary or recurrent melanomas and reduce the need for routinely scheduled follow-up? A protocol for the MEL-SELF randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2021;22(1):324. DOI: 10.1186/s13063-021-05231-7. PMID: 33947444.

Mars M, Morris C, Scott RE. Selfie Telemedicine - What Are the Legal and Regulatory Issues? Stud Health Technol Inform. 2018;254:53-62. DOI: PMID: 30306957.

Boyce Z, Gilmore S, Xu C, Soyer HP. The remote assessment of melanocytic skin lesions: a viable alternative to face-to-face consultation. Dermatology. 2011;223(3):244-50. DOI: 10.1159/000333363. PMID: 22095005.

Manahan MN, Soyer HP, Loescher LJ, et al. A pilot trial of mobile, patient-performed teledermoscopy. Br J Dermatol. 2015;172(4):1072-80. DOI: 10.1111/bjd.13550. PMID: 25418126.

Janda M, Loescher LJ, Soyer HP. Enhanced skin self-examination: a novel approach to skin cancer monitoring and follow-up. JAMA Dermatol. 2013;149(2):231-6. DOI: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2013.1218. PMID: 23426490.

Koh U, Betz-Stablein B, O'Hara M, et al. Development of a Checklist Tool to Assess the Quality of Skin Lesion Images Acquired by Consumers Using Sequential Mobile Teledermoscopy. Dermatology. 2021:1-8. DOI: 10.1159/000515158. PMID: 33849022.

Diethei D, Colley A, Kalving M, et al., editors. Medical selfies: Emotional impacts and practical challenges. Conference Proceedings - 22nd International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services: Expanding the Horizon of Mobile Interaction, MobileHCI 2020; 2020.

Kong F, Horsham C, Rayner J, et al. Consumer Preferences for Skin Cancer Screening Using Mobile Teledermoscopy: A Qualitative Study. Dermatology. 2020;236(2):97-104. DOI: 10.1159/000505620. PMID: 32126557.

Dieng M, Smit AK, Hersch J, et al. Patients' Views about Skin Self-examination after Treatment for Localized Melanoma. JAMA Dermatology. 2019;155(8):914-21. DOI: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2019.0434. PMID:

Koh U, Horsham C, Soyer HP, et al. Consumer Acceptance and Expectations of a Mobile Health Application to Photograph Skin Lesions for Early Detection of Melanoma. Dermatology. 2019;235(1):4-10. DOI: 10.1159/000493728. PMID: 30404081.

Downloads

Published

2024-10-30

How to Cite

1.
Patient Ability to Take Dermoscopic Follow-Up Images of Atypical Melanocytic Lesions With Smartphones: A Pilot Study. Dermatol Pract Concept [Internet]. 2024 Oct. 30 [cited 2024 Dec. 6];14(4):e2024268. Available from: https://dpcj.org/index.php/dpc/article/view/4598

Share