Re-evaluation of the Anatomical Distribution Patterns in Large Congenital Melanocytic Nevus

Sevkiye Aydogdu; Can  Baykal

doi:10.5826/dpc.1504a5113

Re-evaluation of the Anatomical Distribution Patterns in Large Congenital Melanocytic Nevus

Authors

Sevkiye Aydogdu Istanbul University Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
Can Baykal Istanbul University Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey

Keywords:

head, hood, clinical classification, half bathing trunk, Large congenital melanocytic nevus, atypical bolero

Abstract

Introduction: Large congenital melanocytic nevi (LCMNs) are mainly classified according to their distribution patterns, which are thought to reflect their embryological development.

Objectives: We aimed to test the validity of previously described clinical classification systems of LCMNs in a large, well-documented case series.

Methods: The retrospective cohort study including 111 LCMN patients focused on the anatomical distribution of the nevus’s main mass.

Results: The trunk was most commonly affected (N=68), followed by the lower extremities (N=35). When the locations of the nevi were evaluated according to the previously described 6B (bolero, back, bathing trunk, breast/belly, body extremity, body patterns) and 7B (6B with the addition of bonce pattern) classification systems, 15 showed the typical bolero pattern, 13 back pattern, 23 bathing trunk pattern, five breast/belly pattern, 25 body extremity pattern, 14 bonce (head) pattern, and one body pattern. Among the 15 patients who could not be fully classified according to these patterns, five were grouped as “hood” (head and neck) pattern, eight as “half-bathing trunk,” and two as “atypical bolero” sub-patterns. Isolated lesions on the extremities also exhibited two different sub-patterns: encircling the extremity or not.

Conclusion: Most of our cases demonstrated distribution patterns consistent with the 6B and 7B classification systems. However, the isolated head and neck involvement observed in our series may be described as hood pattern. Furthermore, certain variations, such as those seen in the bathing trunk and breast/belly patterns, may be considered subgroups of these patterns. Isolated extremity lesions of LCMNs exhibited two distinct patterns. These findings suggest that, although existing classification systems provide a valuable framework, further subclassifications may be necessary to account for regional variations observed in clinical practice.

References

Alikhan A, Ibrahimi OA, Eisen DB. Congenital melanocytic nevi: where are we now? Part I. Clinical presentation, epidemiology, pathogenesis, histology, malignant transformation, and neurocutaneous melanosis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2012;67:495.e1-17. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2012.06.023. PMID: 22980258.

Martins da Silva VP, Marghoob A, Pigem R, et al. Patterns of distribution of giant congenital melanocytic nevi (GCMN): The 6B rule. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2017;76:689-694. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2016.05.042. PMID: 28325390.

Wang H, Wang W, Lu J, et al. Distribution patterns (7B rule) and characteristics of large congenital melanocytic nevi: A retrospective cohort study in China. Front Med (Lausanne). 2021;9:8:637857. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2021.637857. PMID: 33681263; PMCID: PMC7933508.

Reed WB, Becker Sr SW, Becker SW Jr, Nickel WR. Giant pigmented nevi, melanoma, and leptomeningeal melanocytosis: a clinical and histopathological study. Arch Dermatol. 1965;91:100-119. DOI: 10.1001/archderm.1965.01600080008002. PMID: 14237589.

Torrelo A, Baselga E, Nagore E, Zambrano A, Happle R. Delineation of the various shapes and patterns of nevi. Eur J Dermatol. 2005;15:439-450. PMID: 16280296.

Baykal C, Kurul S. Large congenital melanocytic naevi: clinical considerations based on 27 patients. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2003;17:241-244. DOI: 10.1046/j.1468-3083.2003.00577_12.x. PMID: 12705771.

Kittler NW, Mathes EF, Kinsler V, Frieden IJ. The biker-glove pattern of congenital melanocytic nevi. Pediatr Dermatol. 2019;36:918-921. DOI: 10.1111/pde.13939. PMID: 31448441.

Kinsler VA, Larue L. The patterns of birthmarks suggest a novel population of melanocyte precursors arising around the time of gastrulation. Pigment Cell Res. 2018;31:95-109. DOI: 10.1111/pcmr.12645. PMID: 28940934; PMCID: PMC5765478.

Krengel S, Scope A, Dusza SW, Vonthein R, Marghoob AA. New recommendations for the categorization of cutaneous features of congenital melanocytic nevi. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2013;68:441-451. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2012.05.043. PMID: 22982004.

Lorentzen M, Pers M, Bretteville-Jensen G. The incidence of malignant transformation in giant pigmented nevi. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg. 1977;11:163-167. DOI: 10.3109/02844317709025513. PMID: 609899.

Greeley PW, Middleton AG, Curtin JW. Incidence of malignancy in giant pigmented nevi. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1965;36:26-37. DOI: 10.1097/00006534-196507000-00006. PMID: 14310543.

Rhodes AR, Wood WC, Sober AJ, Mihm MC. Nonepidermal origin of malignant melanoma associated with a giant congenital nevocellular nevus. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1981;67:782-790. DOI: 10.1097/00006534-198106000-00012. PMID: 7243980.

Kaplan EN. The risk of malignancy in large congenital nevi. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1974;53:421-428. DOI: 10.1097/00006534-197404000-00007. PMID: 4815697.

Lanier VC Jr, Pickrell KL, Georgiade NG. Congenital giant nevi: clinical and pathological considerations. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1976;58:48-54. DOI: 10.1097/00006534-197607000-00008. PMID: 935278.

Solomon L, Eng AM, Bene M, Loeffel ED. Giant congenital neuroid melanocytic nevus. Arch Dermatol. 1980;116:318-320. PMID:6768340.

Zitelli JA, Grant MG, Abell E, Boyd JB. Histologic patterns of congenital nevocytic nevi and implications for treatment. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1984;11:402-409. DOI:10.1016/s0190-9622(84)70181-2. PMID:6480949.

Kadonaga JN, Frieden IJ. Neurocutaneous melanosis: definition and review of the literature. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1991;24:747-755. DOI:10.1016/0190-9622(91)70115-i. PMID:1869648.

Ruiz-Maldonado R. Measuring congenital melanocytic nevi. Pediatr Dermatol. 2004;21:178-179. DOI:10.1111/j.0736-8046.2004.21222.x. PMID:15078366.

Kinsler VA, Krengel S, Riviere JB , et al. Next-generation sequencing of nevus spilus-type congenital melanocytic nevus: exquisite genotype-phenotype correlation in mosaic RASopathies. J Invest Dermatol. 2014;134:2658-2660. DOI:10.1038/jid.2014.195. PMID:24751729; PMCID:PMC4165863.

Sawyer SM, Azzopardi PS, Wickremarathne D, Patton GC. The age of adolescence. Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2018;2(3):223–228. DOI:10.1016/S2352-4642(18)30022-1. PMID: 30169257

Kromann AB, Ousager LB, Ali IKM, Aydemir N, Bygum A. Pigmentary mosaicism: a review of original literature and recommendations for future handling. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2018;13:39. DOI:10.1186/s13023-018-0778-6. PMID:29506540; PMCID:PMC5839061.

Kinsler VA, O'Hare P, Bulstrode N, Calonje JE, Chong WK, Hargrave D, et al. Melanoma in congenital melanocytic naevi. Br J Dermatol. 2017;176:1131-1143. DOI:10.1111/bjd.15301. PMID:28078671; PMCID:PMC5484991.