Diagnostic Yield of Abdominal Wall Fat Pad Biopsy for Systemic Amyloidosis in a Low-Prevalence Referral Cohort

Diagnostic Yield of Abdominal Wall Fat Pad Biopsy for Systemic Amyloidosis in a Low-Prevalence Referral Cohort

Authors

Keywords:

systemic amyloidosis , abdominal fat, MGUS, multiple myeloma, Diagnostic

Abstract

Introduction: Systemic amyloidosis is a rare disorder characterized by extracellular amyloid deposition in tissues, leading to variable organ dysfunction. Abdominal wall fat pad biopsy is widely used as a minimally invasive diagnostic approach, yet its sensitivity varies according to population and technique.

Objectives: To assess the diagnostic yield and adequacy of abdominal wall fat pad biopsy for systemic amyloidosis in a low-prevalence referral cohort.

Methods: A retrospective study was conducted at a tertiary university hospital including all consecutive abdominal wall fat pad biopsies performed between January 2021 and June 2025. Clinical data, histopathological findings, and biopsy techniques were reviewed. Adequacy was defined by the presence of well-preserved subcutaneous fat with vascular and stromal structures. Congo red–positive deposits showing apple-green birefringence confirmed amyloidosis.

Results: A total of 106 biopsies from 103 patients (mean age 71.1 ± 12.2 years; 56.3% male) were analyzed. Clinical indications included MGUS (65.0%), multiple myeloma (27.2%), and suspected infiltrative cardiomyopathy or nephrotic proteinuria (8%). Overall, 7/106 biopsies (6.6%) were positive for amyloid. Sensitivity among patients with known systemic amyloidosis was 66.6% (6/9), and specificity was 100%. Only two of 94 patients (2.1%) without prior diagnosis were newly identified. Three punch biopsies (2.8%) were inadequate due to insufficient fat.

Conclusions: Abdominal wall fat pad biopsy is safe and minimally invasive but demonstrates limited diagnostic yield in unselected low-risk populations. It should not be used as a screening tool in patients with monoclonal gammopathies without organ involvement. Adequate tissue sampling and careful patient selection are essential to optimize diagnostic performance.

Author Biographies

Diogo Teixeira, Coimbra Hospital Center, Coimbra, Portugal

Diogo Santos Teixeira MD, Dermatologist.

Department of Dermatology and Venereology.

André Coelho, Unidade Local de Saúde de Santo António, Porto, Portugal

André Clemente Coelho MD, Pathologist, Pathology Department.

José Carlos Cardoso, Coimbra Hospital Center, Coimbra, Portugal

José Carlos Cardoso PhD MD, Dermatologist and Dermatopathologist, Dermatology and Venereology Department.

References

Gertz MA. Immunoglobulin light chain amyloidosis: 2024 update on diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment. Am J Hematol. 2024;99(2):309-324. DOI:10.1002/ajh.27177.

van Gameren II, Hazenberg BP, Bijzet J, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of subcutaneous abdominal fat tissue aspiration. Arthritis Rheum. 2006;54:2015-2021. DOI:10.1002/art.21902.

Guy CD, Jones CK. Abdominal fat pad aspiration biopsy for tissue confirmation of systemic amyloidosis. Diagn Cytopathol. 2001;24(3):181-185. PMID: 11241901.

Obara K, Baba K. A skin biopsy of the abdominal wall without a rash is safe and effective in the diagnosis of systemic amyloidosis. Am J Dermatopathol. 2025;47(4):251-259. DOI:10.1097/DAD.0000000000002862.

Wechalekar AD, Gillmore JD, Hawkins PN. Systemic amyloidosis. Lancet. 2016;387(10038):2641-2654. DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01274-X.

Lachmann HJ, Gallimore R, Gillmore JD, et al. Outcome in systemic AL amyloidosis in relation to free light chain response. Br J Haematol. 2003;122(1):78-84. DOI:10.1046/j.1365-2141.2003.04433.x.

Banypersad SM, Moon JC, Whelan C, et al. Updates in cardiac amyloidosis: a review. J Am Heart Assoc. 2012;1(2):e000364. DOI:10.1161/JAHA.111.000364.

Lee HJ, Kim JS, Mun YC, Lee JK. Ultrasound-guided percutaneous core needle biopsy of abdominal subcutaneous fat for diagnosing amyloidosis: comparison with bone marrow biopsy. Acta Radiol. 2023;64(5):1770-1774. DOI:10.1177/02841851231151369.

Garcia Y, Collins AB, Stone JR. Abdominal fat pad excisional biopsy for the diagnosis and typing of systemic amyloidosis. Hum Pathol. 2018;72:71-79. DOI:10.1016/j.humpath.2017.11.001.

Downloads

Published

2026-04-30

How to Cite

1.
Teixeira J, Teixeira D, Coelho A, Cardoso JC. Diagnostic Yield of Abdominal Wall Fat Pad Biopsy for Systemic Amyloidosis in a Low-Prevalence Referral Cohort. Dermatol Pract Concept. 2026;16(2):6917. doi:10.5826/dpc.1602a6917

Share