Melanoma: Staging and Follow-Up
Keywords:
Melanoma, staging, follow-upAbstract
Cancer staging is the process determining to which extent a cancer has spread and where it is located in the body. A thorough staging is of utmost importance, not only because it provides the most accurate prognostic estimation, but also because several crucial decisions, such as the treatment choice and the follow-up strategy, vary according to the tumor’s stage. The current staging system for melanoma is based on the 8th edition of TNM classification issued by the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) in 2017. It includes a clinical and a pathological staging, both consisting of 5 stages (0-IV). The stage of a melanoma is determined by several factors, among which the Breslow thickness, the pathological presence or absence of ulceration in the primary tumor, the presence and the number of tumor-involved regional lymph nodes, the presence or absence of in-transit, satellite and/or microsatellite metastases, and the presence of distant metastases. Following melanoma diagnosis, an accurate medical workup, in line with the stage and the physical examination, should be performed. A continuous patient monitoring is fundamental to detect a potential relapse or a second primary
melanoma and should be lifelong. However, there is still no universally adopted follow-up strategy program and different follow-up schemes have been suggested. Future prospective studies are needed to evaluate different follow-up protocols according to the adopted therapy, as novel recent therapies (targeted and immunotherapies) are being increasingly used.
References
Gershenwald JE, Scolyer RA, Hess KR, Sondak VK, Long GV, Ross MI, et al. Melanoma staging: Evidence-based changes in the American Joint Committee on Cancer eighth edition cancer staging manual. CA Cancer J Clin. 2017;67(6):472-492. DOI: 10.3322/caac.21409. PMID: 29028110.
Garbe C, Amaral T, Peris K, Hauschild A, Arenberger P, Bastholt L, et al. European consensus-based interdisciplinary guideline for melanoma. Part 1: Diagnostics - Update 2019. Eur J Cancer. 2020;126:141-158. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2019.11.014. PMID: 31928887.
Michielin O, van Akkooi ACJ, Ascierto PA, Dummer R, Keilholz U. Cutaneous melanoma: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up†. Ann Oncol. 2019;30(12):1884-1901. DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdz411. PMID: 31566661.
Balch CM, Soong SJ, Gershenwald JE, Thompson JF, Reintgen DS, Cascinelli N, et al. Prognostic factors analysis of 17,600 melanoma patients: validation of the American Joint Committee on Cancer melanoma staging system. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19(16):3622-3634. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2001.19.16.3622.
Morton DL, Thompson JF, Cochran AJ, Mozzillo N, Nieweg OE, Roses DF, et al. MSLT Group. Final trial report of sentinel-node biopsy versus nodal observation in melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2014;370(7):599-609. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1310460. PMID: 24521106.
Hall BJ, Schmidt RL, Sharma RR, Layfield LJ. Fine-needle aspiration cytology for the diagnosis of metastatic melanoma: systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Clin Pathol. 2013;140(5):635-642. DOI: 10.1309/AJCPWSDDHLLW40WI. PMID: 24124141.
Oude Ophuis CMC, Verhoef C, Grünhagen DJ, Siegel P, Schoengen A, Röwert-Huber J, et al. Long-term results of ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration cytology in conjunction with sentinel node biopsy support step-wise approach in melanoma. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2017;43(8):1509-1516. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2017.02.009. PMID: 28262276.
Bohelay G, Battistella M, Pages C, de Margerie-Mellon C, Basset-Seguin N, Viguier M, et al. Ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy of superficial lymph nodes: an alternative to fine-needle aspiration cytology for the diagnosis of lymph node metastasis in cutaneous melanoma. Melanoma research. 2015;25:519-527. DOI: 10.1097/CMR.0000000000000161. PMID: 25933210.
Statius Muller MG, van Leeuwen PA, de Lange-De Klerk ES, van Diest PJ, Pijpers R, Ferwerda CC, et al. The sentinel lymph node status is an important factor for predicting clinical outcome in patients with Stage I or II cutaneous melanoma. Cancer. 2001;91(12):2401-2408. DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(20010615)91:12<2401::AID-CNCR1274>3.0.CO;2-I.
Wright BE, Scheri RP, Ye X, Faries MB, Turner RR, Essner R, et al. Importance of sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with thin melanoma. Arch Surg. 2008;143(9):892-899; discussion 899-900. DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.143.9.892. PMID: 18794428.
Lima Sánchez J, Sánchez Medina M, García Duque O, Fiúza Pérez M, Carreteri Hernández G, Fernández Palácios J. Sentinel lymph node biopsy for cutaneous melanoma: a 6 years study. Indian J Plast Surg. 2013;46(1):92-97. DOI: 10.4103/0970-0358.113717. PMID: 23960312.
Ranieri JM, Wagner JD, Wenck S, Johnson CS, Coleman JJ 3rd. The prognostic importance of sentinel lymph node biopsy in thin melanoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2006;13(7):927-932. DOI: 10.1245/ASO.2006.04.023. PMID: 16788753.
Mozzillo N, Pennacchioli E, Gandini S, Caracò C, Crispo A, Botti G, et al. Sentinel node biopsy in thin and thick melanoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20(8):2780-2786. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-012-2826-0. PMID. 23720068.
Leiter U, Stadler R, Mauch C, Hohenberger W, Brockmeyer NH, Berking C, et al. Final Analysis of DeCOG-SLT Trial: No Survival Benefit for Complete Lymph Node Dissection in Patients With Melanoma With Positive Sentinel Node. J Clin Oncol. 2019; 37(32): 3000–3008. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.18.02306. PMID: 31557067.
Faries MB, Thompson JF, Cochran AJ, Andtbacka RH, Mozzillo N, Zager JS, et al. (2017). Completion Dissection or Observation for Sentinel-Node Metastasis in Melanoma. N Eng J Med. 2017; 376(23): 2211–2222.
Kyrgidis A, Tzellos T, Mocellin S, Apalla Z, Lallas A, Pilati P, Stratigos A. Sentinel lymph node biopsy followed by lymph node dissection for localised primary cutaneous melanoma. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015; 16(5): CD010307. DOI 10.1002/14651858.CD010307.pub2. PMID: 25978975.
Verver D, Rekkas A, Garbe C, van Klaveren D, van Akkooi ACJ, Rutkowski P, et al. The EORTC-DeCOG nomogram adequately predicts outcomes of patients with sentinel node-positive melanoma without the need for completion lymph node dissection. Eur J Cancer. 2020; 134: 9–18. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2020.04.022. PMID: 32454396.
Joyce KM, Joyce CW, Jones DM, Donnellan P, Hussey AJ, Regan PJ, et al. An assessment of histological margins and recurrence of melanoma in situ. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2015;3(2):e301. DOI:10.1097/GOX.0000000000000272. PMID: 25750840.
Duffy KL, Truong A, Bowen GM, Andtbacka RH, Hyngstrom J, Bowles T, et al. Adequacy of 5-mm surgical excision margins for non-lentiginous melanoma in situ. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2014;71(4):835-838. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2014.06.044. PMID: 25219711.
de Vries K, Greveling K, Prens LM, Munte K, Koljenović S, van Doorn MB, et al. Recurrence rate of lentigo maligna after micrographically controlled staged surgical excision. Br J Dermatol. 2016;174(3):588-593. DOI: 10.1111/bjd.14325. PMID: 26616840.
Romano E, Scordo M, Dusza SW, Coit DG, Chapman PB. Site and timing of first relapse in stage III melanoma patients: implications for follow-up guidelines. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(18):3042-3047. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2009.26.2063. PMID: 20479405.
Salama AK, de Rosa N, Scheri RP, Pruitt SK, Herndon JE 2nd, Marcello J, et al. Hazard-rate analysis and patterns of recurrence in early stage melanoma: moving towards a rationally designed surveillance strategy. PLoS One. 2013;8(3):e57665. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0057665. PMID: 23516415.
Gassenmaier M, Stec T, Keim U, Leiter U, Eigentler TK, Metzler G, Garbe C. Incidence and characteristics of thick second primary melanomas: a study of the German Central Malignant Melanoma Registry. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2019 Jan;33(1):63-70. DOI: 10.1111/jdv.15194. PMID: 30051517.
Hofmann U, Szedlak M, Rittgen W, Jung EG, Schadendorf D. Primary staging and follow-up in melanoma patients--monocenter evaluation of methods, costs and patient survival. Br J Cancer. 2002;87(2):151-157. DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6600428. PMID: 12107834.
Osella-Abate S, Ribero S, Sanlorenzo M, Maule MM, Richiardi L, Merletti F, et al. Risk factors related to late metastases in 1,372 melanoma patients disease free more than 10 years. Int J Cancer. 2015;136(10):2453-2457. DOI: 10.1002/ijc.29281. PMID: 25331444.
Crowley NJ, Seigler HF. Late recurrence of malignant melanoma. Analysis of 168 patients. Ann Surg. 1990;212(2):173-177. DOI: 10.1097/00000658-199008000-00010. PMID: 2375648.
Jones MS, Torisu-Itakura H, Flaherty DC, et al. Second Primary Melanoma: Risk Factors, Histopathologic Features, Survival, and Implications for Follow-Up. Am Surg 2016;82:1009-1013. DOI: 10.1177/000313481608201034. PMID: 27779995.
Schuurman MS, de Waal AC, Thijs EJM, van Rossum MM, Kiemeney LALM, Aben KKH. Risk factors for second primary melanoma among Dutch patients with melanoma. Br J Dermatol. 2017;176:971-978. DOI: 10.1111/bjd.15024. PMID: 27596937.
Youlden DR, Youl PH, Soyer HP, Aitken JF, Baade PD. Distribution of subsequent primary invasive melanomas following a first primary invasive or in situ melanoma Queensland, Australia, 1982-2010. JAMA Dermatol. 2014;150(5):526-534. DOI: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2013.9852. PMID: 25093216.
Lallas A, Apalla Z, Kyrgidis A, Papageorgiou C, Boukovinas I, Bobos M, et al. Second primary melanomas in a cohort of 977 melanoma patients within the first 5 years of monitoring. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2020;82(2):398-406. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2019.08.074. PMID: 31499156.
Youlden DR, Baade PD, Soyer HP, Youl PH, Kimlin MG, Aitken JF, Green AC, Khosrotehrani K. Ten-Year Survival after Multiple Invasive Melanomas Is Worse than after a Single Melanoma: a Population-Based Study. J Invest Dermatol. 2016 Nov;136(11):2270-2276. DOI: 10.1016/j.jid.2016.03.014. PMID: 27019458.
Xing Y, Bronstein Y, Ross MI, Askew RL, Lee JE, Gershenwald JE, et al. Contemporary diagnostic imaging modalities for the staging and surveillance of melanoma patients: a meta-analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011;103(2):129-142. DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djq455. PMID: 21081714.
Riquelme-Mc Loughlin C, Podlipnik S, Bosch-Amate X, Riera-Monroig J, Barreiro A, Espinosa N, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of imaging studies for initial staging of T2b-T4b melanoma patients. A cross-sectional study. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2019;81(6):1330-1338. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2019.05.076. PMID: 31163236.
Marczynski GT, Laus AC, Dos Reis MB, Reis RM, Vazquez VL. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) detection is associated with shorter progression-free survival in advanced melanoma patients. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):18682. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-75792-1. PMID: 33122747.
Huynh K, Hoon DS. Liquid Biopsies for Assessing Metastatic Melanoma Progression. Crit Rev Oncog. 2016;21(1-2):141-154. DOI: 10.1615/CritRevOncog.2016016075. PMID: 27481010.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Dermatology Practical & Conceptual applies a Creative Commons Attribution License (CCAL) to all works we publish (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/). Authors retain the copyright for their published work.