Scale and Pustule on Dermoscopy of Rosacea: A Diagnostic Clue for Demodex Species

Scale and Pustule on Dermoscopy of Rosacea: A Diagnostic Clue for Demodex Species

Authors

  • Gamze Serarslan Department of Dermatology, Mustafa Kemal University, Hatay, Turkey
  • Özlem Makbule Kaya Department of Parasitology, Mustafa Kemal University Hatay, Turkey
  • Emre Dirican Department of Biostatistics, Mustafa Kemal University Hatay, Turkey

Keywords:

Demodex folliculorum, Demodex brevis, rosacea, dermoscopy

Abstract

Background: Demodex mites are highly found in the skin of patients with rosacea.The diagnosis of Demodex can be made by standardized skin surface biopsy. Dermoscopy is a tool used in the noninvasive diagnosis of various dermatological diseases.

Objectives: To determine whether dermoscopic features of demodicosis are associated with the result of standardized skin surface biopsy in patients with rosacea and to compare dermoscopic features of rosacea in Demodex-positive and negative samples and Demodex type.

Methods: A total of 30 patients (7 male, 23 female) were included in the study. Dermoscopic examination was performed on both the clinically most severely affected areas and adjacent healthy skin. The skin surface biopsy sample was taken from the same place from where the dermoscopic image was taken.

Results: A total of 83 (lesion n = 60, non-lesion n = 23) areas were evaluated. Demodex was detected in 60.2% (n = 50) of the samples. Half of these samples revealed only Demodex folliculorum, and the remaining half revealed D folliculorum and Demodex brevis. Of theDemodex-positive samples, 88% had Demodex tails (P =0.001) and68% Demodex follicular openings (P = 0.002) on dermoscopy. In D folliculorum+D brevis-positive samples, the rate of scale and pustule was higher than D folliculorum-positive samples (P = 0.017 and P = 0032,respectively).

Conclusions: The sensitivity and specificity of Demodex tail are higher than Demodex follicular opening and scale and pustule detection with dermoscopy and may indicate the coexistence of both D folliculorum and D brevis.

Author Biographies

Özlem Makbule Kaya, Department of Parasitology, Mustafa Kemal University Hatay, Turkey

Mustafa Kemal University Faculty of Medicine Department of Parasitology, Hatay, Turkey

Emre Dirican, Department of Biostatistics, Mustafa Kemal University Hatay, Turkey

Mustafa Kemal University Faculty of Medicine Department of Biostatistics

References

Ahn CS, Huang WW. Rosacea pathogenesis. Dermatol Clin. 2018;36(2):81-86. DOI: 10.1016/j.det.2017.11.001. PMID: 29499802.

Desch C, Nutting WB. Demodex folliculorum (Simon) and D. brevis akbulatova of man: redescription and reevaluation. J Parasitol. 1972;58(1):169-177. DOI: 10.2307/3278267. PMID: 5062457.

Rufli T, Mumcuoglu Y. The hair follicle mites D. folliculorum and D. brevis: biology and medical importance. A review. Dermatologica 1981;162(1):1-11. DOI: 10.1159/000250228. PMID: 6453029.

Jing X, Shuling G, Ying L. Environmental scanning electron microscopy observation of the ultrastructure of Demaodex. Microsc Res Tech. 2005;68(5):284-289. DOI: 10.1002/jemt.20253. PMID: 16315233.

Forton F, Seys B. Density of Demodex folliculorum in rosacea: a case-control study using standardized skin-surface biposy. Br J Dermatol. 1993;128(6):650-659. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.1993.tb00261.x. PMID: 8338749.

Errichetti E, Stinco G. Dermoscopy in general Dermatology: A practical overview. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2016;6(4):471-507. DOI: 10.1007/s13555-016-0141-6. PMID: 27613297.

Segal R, Mimouni D, Feuerman H, Pagovitz O, David M. Dermoscopy as a diagnostic tool in demodicidosis. Int J Dermatol 2010;49(9):1018-1023. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-4632.2010.04495.x.. PMID: 20931672.

Tan J, Almeida LMC, Bewley A, et al. Updating the diagnosis, classification and assessment of rosacea: recommendations from the global ROSacea COnsensus (ROSCO) panel. Br J Dermatol. 2017;176(2):431-438. DOI: 10.1111/bjd.15122. PMID: 27718519.

Lallas A, Argenziano G, Apalla Z et al. Dermoscopic patterns of common facial inflammatory skin diseases. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2014;28(5):609-614. DOI: 10.1111/jdv.12146. PMID: 23489377.

Lallas A, Argenziano G, Longo C, et al. Polygonal vessels of rosacea are highlighted by dermoscopy. Int J Dermatol. 2014;53(5):e325-327. DOI: 10.1111/ijd.12270. PMID: 23879349.

Karadağ Köse Ö, Borlu M. Definition of videodermoscopic features of demodicosis. Int J Dermatol. 2019;58(10):1153-1159. DOI: 10.1111/ijd.14547. PMID: 31198996.

Durdu M, Errichetti E, Eskiocak AH, Ilkit M. High accuracy of recognition of common forms of folliculitis by dermoscopy: An observational study. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2019;81(2):463-471. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2019.03.054. PMID: 30914342.

Forton F, Song M. Limitations of standardized skin surface biopsy in measurement of the density of Demodex folliculorum. A case report. Br J Dermatol. 1998;139(4):697-700. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2133.1998.02471.x. PMID: 9892917.

Downloads

Published

2021-01-29

Issue

Section

Research

How to Cite

1.
Serarslan G, Makbule Kaya Özlem, Dirican E. Scale and Pustule on Dermoscopy of Rosacea: A Diagnostic Clue for Demodex Species. Dermatol Pract Concept. 2021;11(1):e2021139. doi:10.5826/dpc.1101a139

Share